Re: [racket-dev] Set Equality with Cyclic Structure is not as Expected

2012-05-08 Thread Carl Eastlund
This may be a consequence of updating mutable state inside a set datastructure. I haven't tried yet, but non-cyclic uses of mutable boxes inside sets may have similar results. Carl Eastlund On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Looks like a bug. Why don't you file a bug

Re: [racket-dev] Set Equality with Cyclic Structure is not as Expected

2012-05-08 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Looks like a bug. Why don't you file a bug report? On May 7, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Daniel King wrote: > Hi, > > The following code snippet is a bit confusing to me. Sets with cyclic > structure > are not equal? even though they meet my intuitive definition of equal. I'm > curious exactly where m