FWIW, this is done now.
Robby
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I'll try to do something along these lines. It shouldn't be hard to
> make it a tooltip.
>
> Robby
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, John Clements
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Matthias Fell
On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I'll try to do something along these lines. It shouldn't be hard to
> make it a tooltip.
Don't spend too much time on it!
John
>
> Robby
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, John Clements
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Matt
I'll try to do something along these lines. It shouldn't be hard to
make it a tooltip.
Robby
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
>>
>> +a lot; I'd like that
>
> Robby, what's the nastiness threshold for getting somet
On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> +a lot; I'd like that
Robby, what's the nastiness threshold for getting something like this into the
distribution?
- is it okay to have a menu item with no action?
- is it okay to just say how many arrows--lines, really--radiate from
+a lot; I'd like that
On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:48 PM, John Clements wrote:
> When I'm using online check syntax, I often look at the lines leaving an
> identifier and wonder: is that just one line, or are there two or three? When
> lines overlap, there's no easy way to tell. This can be importa
John Clements wrote at 06/20/2012 10:48 PM:
When I'm using online check syntax, I often look at the lines leaving
an identifier and wonder: is that just one line, or are there two or
three? When lines overlap, there's no easy way to tell. This can be
important in refactoring decisions, or in de
6 matches
Mail list logo