So, rebasing is a common operation since we're working with a central
repository. But it's very annoying that files are touched whenever it
happens. For example, you modify "collects/foo/bar.rkt", you then run
a "git pull --rebase" to get updated with the current state, and since
I pushed some ch
> 1. collect evidence that size matters to anyone out there besides you
I'm happy to be a datapoint
Size matters to me for three reasons;
- startup time is significantly slowed on my (early 2010) MacBook pro
given all the packages :
- I disable all but the minimum to run on my ASus 701 4g which s
On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> But I still think that giving up on any organization will only make
> things worse, and I don't want that to happen.
Okay. As I wrote before:
> For Chicago:
>
> 1. collect evidence that size matters to anyone out there besides you
>
> 2. pr
On Jul 8, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> > #%module-begin as the top level controlling macro is a distinguishing
> > feature. Requires and provides can only be there and you know there's
> > only one application.
>
> These could be an argument to
On Jul 8, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> 2. I do not understand why #%body isn't enough. Couldn't #%body
>locally expand to the point where defs and exps are
>distinguished?
Yes, it could -- and I guess that would be in analogy to
`#%module-begin'. But I generally don't like that macros
On Jul 8, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> This sounds like we should give up on stratification.
That was my first thought when I saw that mess: give up also on
distributing smaller packages, and dump the current distributions that
are used as sanity checks. (Given that I usually end up in long
thre
On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> #%module-begin as the top level controlling macro is a distinguishing
> feature. Requires and provides can only be there and you know there's
> only one application.
These could be an argument to the #%...-begin macro:
are-you-top-level? :: (
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:55 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
>> Some examples that show how useful this is:
>>
>> * In the lazy language you want the implicit begin to force all
>> expressions except for the last one.
>>
>> * I've redefined
This sounds like we should give up on stratification.
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Jul 6, Petey Aldous wrote:
>> That would be interesting and it would not be terribly difficult to
>> instrument setup-plt to do it.
>
> There's no reason to do that -- the data is all t
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:55 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Some examples that show how useful this is:
>
> * In the lazy language you want the implicit begin to force all
>expressions except for the last one.
>
> * I've redefined the implicit begin (in an ugly way) for my course
>language to f
10 matches
Mail list logo
