The documentation doesn't appear to explain the meaning of the
'disappeared-use and 'disappeared-binding syntax properties. I've
gathered that Check Syntax looks for them, but I don't know exactly
how it uses them. Do other tools interpret them too?
_
The basic idea is that some identifiers from the original program
don't survive into the fully expanded form. So macros that makes those
identifiers disappear record that they've done so with this syntax
property.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Casey Klein
wrote:
> The documentation does
Jay McCarthy writes:
> I would like to remove the implicit preference the Web Server gives to
> Xexprs and the old esoteric bytes response format. This is backwards
> incompatible change, but I think it will make the server better in the
> long run as it will promote other HTML encodings, like t
3 matches
Mail list logo
