I think the mismatch was not intentional.
Maybe `do-copy' originally had a consistent interface, or maybe it was
written down in `editor<%>' before it became apparent that its
interface would be be specific to each different kin of editor. I can't
think of any reason to have `do-copy' in its prese
If we take it out of editor<%>, we should not encounter any problems
whatsoever. It is possible that additional implements-interface checks will
succeed, but I am doubtful. Other than that I can't think of any problems.
Should Asumu try and just run the whole test suite and if it works you co
Sounds fine.
At Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:20:54 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
>
> If we take it out of editor<%>, we should not encounter any problems
> whatsoever. It is possible that additional implements-interface checks will
> succeed, but I am doubtful. Other than that I can't think of any
I've just committed the culmination of this thread.
I've removed the coercive contracts and replaced them with a global
imperative any->response hook that defaults to "off" but can easily be
turned "on" to support X-exprs or the old behavior of the Web Server.
Jay
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:55 PM
Thanks, Jay.
Robby
On Tuesday, December 7, 2010, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I've just committed the culmination of this thread.
> I've removed the coercive contracts and replaced them with a global
> imperative any->response hook that defaults to "off" but can easily be turned
> "on" to support X-e
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> I've removed the coercive contracts and replaced them with a global
> imperative any->response hook that defaults to "off" but can easily be
> turned "on" to support X-exprs or the old behavior of the Web Server.
>
Great! Thanks.
yc
__
If you go to the racket page at github (https://github.com/plt/racket)
and hit the downloads button, you get a download with three ancient
versions. The reson for that is that it sorts the tags in reverse
lexicographic order. (The same holds for the "switch tags" dropdown
list.)
I've asked on #g
It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the list.
But I wouldn't want you to spend too much time on it.
Robby
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> If you go to the racket page at github (ht
6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
> went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the
> list.
OK, so I'll take it as a "yes" vote. Any suggestion for new names?
One option is to go with the common misconception
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
>> went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the
>> list.
>
> OK, so I'll take it as a "yes" vote. Any suggestion for
Four minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > 6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> >> It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
> >> went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the
> >> list.
> >
> > OK,
On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
>> went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the
>> list.
>
> OK, so I'll take it as a "yes" vote. Any suggestion for n
Two minutes ago, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > 6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> >> It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if
> >> someone went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle
> >> of the list.
> >
> > OK
13 matches
Mail list logo
