[racket-dev] Building without docs

2011-01-12 Thread Noel Welsh
Hi all, I'm trying to build 4.2.2 without building the docs. I thought I could just run make and then setup-plt -D, but make does not install the binaries. Looking through the Makefile did not lead to enlightenment. Any suggestions? Thanks, N. PS: FWIW, I'm writing a Chef (http://wiki.opscode.co

Re: [racket-dev] Building without docs

2011-01-12 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:29:03 +, Noel Welsh wrote: > I'm trying to build 4.2.2 without building the docs. I thought I could > just run make and then setup-plt -D, but make does not install the > binaries. Looking through the Makefile did not lead to enlightenment. > Any suggestions? Does `make

Re: [racket-dev] sudo make install

2011-01-12 Thread Jon Rafkind
On 01/03/2011 02:11 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:55:05 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Robby Findler >> wrote: >>> Or maybe there is another possible solution that involves changing how >>> the distribution and or the docs build works? >> I

[racket-dev] strange output on console

2011-01-12 Thread Matthias Felleisen
This showed up in the console from where I launched drracket: > file #f produces eof from read-language > port-next-location (#f #f 36) > str ";; Xexpr -> [Listof (Cons Nat Nat)]" The string is a part of my program. _ For list-related admin

Re: [racket-dev] strange output on console

2011-01-12 Thread Robby Findler
read-language is never supposed to return eof but in some situations I cannot reproduce it does (this used to cause drracket to get stuck in an edit sequence). So I added a printf at a callsite; if you can make it happen that would be useful. Robby On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, Matthias Felleis