Updating tools from drscheme->drrracket involves two steps:
1) changing the tool to refer to drracket, and
2) changing the info.rkt file to refer to drracket-tools rather than tools.
Unfortunately, if you do #2 before #1, you get a real head-scratcher of an
error message:
define-unit-binding:
Is it possible you're misparsing the error message? The message (I
think!) says that the unit expects its import to be drscheme:tool^ but
that it is invoked with something else (drracket:tool^ in this case).
(Not that this defends anything about the head-scratching-ness, but
just to clarify what t
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:03 PM, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
>> Let's get the ball rolling on the release announcement. Here are draft
>> bullets for the drawing and GUI libraries:
>
> I feel like we're missing the forest for the trees: there's a gre
On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Is it possible you're misparsing the error message? The message (I
> think!) says that the unit expects its import to be drscheme:tool^ but
> that it is invoked with something else (drracket:tool^ in this case).
>
> (Not that this defends anyth
On Feb 9, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Stevie:
> a04b8d989936e64e29d2ae123da39159c2cdf2e6
>Change instanceof/c to allow more contracts.
>
>Now instanceof/c no longer checks explicitly for a class/c contract, so
>or/c or and/c of class/c contracts succeed.
> 92775c5e4ee55986da
Got the right score now.
> At Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:32:12 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
>> * Improved Same Game: adjusted the way it draws and the scoring system
>> (current known best is 1300+ can you beat that?)
* Improved Same Game: adjusted the way it draws and the scoring system
(current know
Here's a new draft that folds in the contributions so far --- all
edited to varying degrees. I left out `racket/snip', because it seems
relatively obscure.
Racket version 5.1 is now available from
http://racket-lang.org/
The most significant change in
I think there are a non-trival number of people who deal with snips to
process student submissions that it is worth an extra line or two
(that I've put in below)
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Here's a new draft that folds in the contributions so far --- all
> edited to v
8 matches
Mail list logo
