Re: [racket-dev] racket/stream

2011-03-27 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:50:03 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > > I'm not convinced that `racket/sequence' is useless. Here's a > > > > list of the current functions (with the current names): > > > > I threw out `sequence-cons', `sequence-first', and `sequence-rest', > > and I kept the rest. The var

Re: [racket-dev] racket/stream

2011-03-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
5 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > There's a naming-convention clash between > > * `in-...' for sequences (sometimes streams) especially intended >for direct use in `for' forms, and > > * operations on streams and sequences, which would normally start >`stream-' or `sequence-'. >

[racket-dev] handin-server web interface... non-functional? and docs don't appear?

2011-03-27 Thread John Clements
It looks to me like the handin server's web interface isn't currently working. I enabled the handin server with the https-server-port set to 7980, and got no response on that port. Perhaps the larger mystery here is why it is that I just can't find the documentation for the handin server... se