If I want to use syntax-parse to define a syntactic form that expands into a
use of 'match', is there a built-in syntax class that recognizes 'match'
patterns? Unfortunately, searching for 'match' and 'pattern' in the
syntax-parse docs isn't so helpful... :).
John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MI
Match patterns are macro-extensible. Just about any s-expression is a
potential match pattern. I don't think there's anything for a syntax
class to discern, just accept whatever someone puts there, and trust
expansion to sort out any errors.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:20 AM, John C
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Match patterns are macro-extensible. Just about any s-expression is a
> potential match pattern. I don't think there's anything for a syntax
> class to discern, just accept whatever someone puts there, and trust
> expansion to sort out any
3 matches
Mail list logo
