Re: [racket-dev] See, that's what I'm talking about

2011-09-10 Thread John Clements
On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Jay Kominek wrote: > You're welcome? Well, I'm just glad to see that you were prompted by my message; given the timing, my other hypothesis was that Facebook was reading all of my e-mail. Not impossible, I suppose... John smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptograp

Re: [racket-dev] weird (memory?) bug using (dis)similar require mechanisms

2011-09-10 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:29:13 +0200, Marijn wrote: > this racket bug was discovered when I was trying out geiser which > starts programs in a way that exposes this bug. The program starts > correctly but none of the buttons work (or only reserve screen space) > and it is hard to terminate the progra

Re: [racket-dev] Using clang to Build Racket on Mac OS X

2011-09-10 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:38:44 -0500, "Will M. Farr" wrote: > The only wart in the process is the following: when compiling with clang or > llvm-gcc with the -O4 option, which enables link-time optimization in the > LLVM > backend, the GC is unable to correctly determine the stack growth direction

Re: [racket-dev] Suggestions for monitoring unresponsive web server connection?

2011-09-10 Thread Jay McCarthy
I agree with the other things that have been recommended. As far as the file descriptors go, IIRC the Racket VM uses the "old" asynchronous I/O system in Linux that limits to FD_SETSIZE files (which is normally very large, but still a fixed number.) It is unlikely you are hitting that. As far as

Re: [racket-dev] Using clang to Build Racket on Mac OS X

2011-09-10 Thread Will M. Farr
Thanks, Matthew! It seems to build OK now. Will On Sep 11, 2011, at 6:42 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:38:44 -0500, "Will M. Farr" wrote: >> The only wart in the process is the following: when compiling with clang or >> llvm-gcc with the -O4 option, which enables link-tim