Re: [racket-dev] [plt] distributed computing

2012-03-07 Thread Stephen Bloch
On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:44 AM, t...@racket-lang.org wrote: > | Distributed Places allows the spawning of remote racket processes and > | places. Distributed Places communicate transparently over TCP sockets. > ... On a related subject, has anybody looked into CUDA programming in Racket? Stephen

[racket-dev] submodules

2012-03-07 Thread Matthew Flatt
I've added "submodules" to a version of Racket labeled v5.2.900.1 that's here: https://github.com/mflatt/submodules After we've sorted out any controversial parts of the design and after the documentation is complete, then I'll be ready to merge to the main Racket repo. Why Submodules? ---

Re: [racket-dev] Any notion of ".jar" files for Racket?

2012-03-07 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:51:45 -0500, Danny Yoo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote: > > On 03/06/2012 02:14 PM, Danny Yoo wrote: > >> > >> The Java folks have a notion of ".jar" files that pack a collection of > >> class files into a single archive, but also make it pos

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] distributed computing

2012-03-07 Thread Jay McCarthy
I have an OpenCL module on Planet. Jay On 3/7/12, Stephen Bloch wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:44 AM, t...@racket-lang.org wrote: > >> | Distributed Places allows the spawning of remote racket processes and >> | places. Distributed Places communicate transparently over TCP sockets. >> ... > >

Re: [racket-dev] submodules

2012-03-07 Thread Jay McCarthy
I love it---especially for the test collecting macro. I will try to write it and report back. Jay On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > I've added "submodules" to a version of Racket labeled v5.2.900.1 > that's here: > >  https://github.com/mflatt/submodules > > After we've so