> * Stephen Chang
> - Lazy Racket Tests
> - Lazy stepper tests
pass
>
> * Eli Barzilay
> - Swindle Tests
> - XREPL Tests
> - Racket Tree: compare new distribution tree to previous one
> - Run the unix installer tests
> - Run zsh completions tests ("_racket --self-test")
>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Jay McCarthy
> - Web Server Tests
> - XML Tests
> - HTML Tests
> - PLAI Tests
> - Racklog tests
> - Datalog tests
All passed
--
Jay McCarthy
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay
"
At Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:58:32 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Matthew Flatt
>- Racket Tests
>- Languages Tests
>- GRacket Tests (Also check that `gracket -z' and `gracket-text' still
> works in Windows and Mac OS X)
Done.
>- mzc --exe tests
Repair pushed for merge.
>-
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> * Robby Findler
> - DrRacket Tests
> - Framework Tests
> - Contracts Tests
> - Games Tests
> - Teachpacks Tests: image tests
> - PLaneT Tests
> - Redex Tests
> Updates:
> - DrRacket Updates: update HISTORY
> - Redex Upd
> * Jon Rafkind
> Release tests for (one of the) linux releases:
> - Test that the `racket' and `racket-textual' source releases
> compile fine (note that they're still called `plt' and `mz' at
> this stage).
> - Test that the binary installers for both work, try each one in
> b
On 10/16/12 12:58 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* David Van Horn
- EoPL Tests
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On 10/01/2012 02:06 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
* `math/base' re-exports `racket/math', but with extra constants (like
`phi.0') and functions (like `power-of-two?'). It also exports improved
hyperbolic functions, such as a new `sinh' that
>
> Ok, will do. Will report back when the build completes.
Followup: wow. Ok, so I figured out what was going on, sorta. Let me
show it just in case anyone else encounters something this weird.
---
So I first tried making my repository clean by doing "git clean -fdx",
which is supposed to r
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> A few minutes ago, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>> Try building the release branch in a fresh clone. (It should be safe
>> to clone your existing clone (or "checkout") rather than clone
>> directly from the server.) If the errors go away, I would su
A few minutes ago, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Try building the release branch in a fresh clone. (It should be safe
> to clone your existing clone (or "checkout") rather than clone
> directly from the server.) If the errors go away, I would suspect
> the problem is that git clean missed some things.
>
Try building the release branch in a fresh clone. (It should be safe to
clone your existing clone (or "checkout") rather than clone directly
from the server.) If the errors go away, I would suspect the problem is
that git clean missed some things.
I just tried it and encountered no errors.
Ry
Does anyone else see severe build problems on the plt/release branch?
I'm seeing a lot of compile-time errors during 'raco setup'; it's
making it difficult to test things because when a problem occurs, I'm
not sure if it's my fault or if the repo is just in a weird state.
I made sure to clean my
Agreed.
I wonder if we couldn't find a way to mirror the distinction between
(define x ...) and (define (x) ...) somehow, combining the functionality
of match-define and define/match. After all, we don't have define-var
and define-fun, right?
(match/define (list x y z) '(1 2 3))
x --> 1
(match/
At Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:42:06 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2012-10-16 15:27:46 -0400, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
> > 843c722 Matthew Flatt 2012-10-16 15:10
> > :
> > | add an argument to `{chaperone,impersonate}-prompt-tag'
> > |
> > | The new argument gets to filter results that come from
What is 'p' in this example?
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Stephen Bloch
> >
> wrote:
> >>> Another data point: If "define/match" expands to a "define" of a
> procedure
> >>> that dispatches to a set of implementations based on a pa
Ryan Culpepper writes:
> * Mike Sperber
> - DMdA Tests
> - Stepper Tests
> - Signature Tests
Done.
--
Regards,
Mike
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>>> Another data point: If "define/match" expands to a "define" of a procedure
>>> that dispatches to a set of implementations based on a pattern-match of
>>> actual arguments... then the name is exactly what I'd expect for such a
>>> feature i
17 matches
Mail list logo
