No, only Eli can do that (or the submitter).
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> How do I close pull requests made to the plt/racket repo on GitHub? Am I
> authorized to do that in the first place?
>
> Neil ⊥
> _
> Racket Developers list:
> http://list
I'm doing some micro-optimizations on my rb-tree implementation. One thing
I'm testing is inserting the entire contents of /usr/share/dict/words.
It's heavily dominated by structure-mutation code.
Under 5.3.1, I see the following times:
Timing construction of /usr/share/dict/words:
inse
I'm seeing a weird behavior of the installation of Racket 5.3.1 on
OpenBSD (I don't know if other OS are affected or not).
On amd64 Racket installs this files:
/usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_168.png
/usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_169.png
/usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_
I don't know if this is the reason, but I do know that Matthew made
the jit able to see thru some structure operations. Perhaps that
enables some other optimizations now that weren't in 5.3.1.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> I'm doing some micro-optimizations on my rb-t
What are they?
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
wrote:
> I'm seeing a weird behavior of the installation of Racket 5.3.1 on OpenBSD
> (I don't know if other OS are affected or not).
>
> On amd64 Racket installs this files:
> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images
On 11/19/12 00:08, Robby Findler wrote:
What are they?
The most of the images say "we claim the privilege". One is the US Congress.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
wrote:
I'm seeing a weird behavior of the installation of Racket 5.3.1 on OpenBSD
(I do
How does compare to builtin mutable hashes?
2012/11/18, Danny Yoo :
> I'm doing some micro-optimizations on my rb-tree implementation. One thing
> I'm testing is inserting the entire contents of /usr/share/dict/words.
> It's heavily dominated by structure-mutation code.
>
> Under 5.3.1, I see t
I have it as well. Seems to be in the git repo. Google of the phrase is
interesting as well.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <
i...@juanfra.info> wrote:
> On 11/19/12 00:08, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> What are they?
>>
>
> The most of the images say "we claim the
file:///usr/local/racket/doc/images/Spatial_Transformations.html?q=Compositing
It is being generated and used as part of the standard doc.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
> I have it as well. Seems to be in the git repo. Google of the phrase is
> interesting as well.
>
>
>
Maybe the difference is that there is a bug on x86, then, as in my
copy of that file I see a bunch of errors in the Compositing docs.
Do you see errors in one installation and images in the other?
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
> file:///usr/local/racket/doc/images/Spa
Yes, a program that is all structure creation, access, and mutation
should run around twice as fast compared to v5.3.1.
At Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:07:12 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> I don't know if this is the reason, but I do know that Matthew made
> the jit able to see thru some structure operation
On 11/19/12 01:13, Robby Findler wrote:
Maybe the difference is that there is a bug on x86, then, as in my
copy of that file I see a bunch of errors in the Compositing docs.
Do you see errors in one installation and images in the other?
Yes. I see errors (red text in the web page) in both arch
Sounds like a bug to me, then.
Thanks!
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
wrote:
> On 11/19/12 01:13, Robby Findler wrote:
>>
>> Maybe the difference is that there is a bug on x86, then, as in my
>> copy of that file I see a bunch of errors in the Compositing
It's a problem with the contract boundary. The examples work fine in
Typed Racket. The problem type is this:
(: flomap-transform
(case->
(flomap Flomap-Transform -> flomap)
(flomap Flomap-Transform Integer Integer Integer Integer
-> flomap)))
The contract system claims th
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> It's a problem with the contract boundary. The examples work fine in Typed
> Racket. The problem type is this:
>
> (: flomap-transform
>(case->
> (flomap Flomap-Transform -> flomap)
> (flomap Flomap-Transform Integer Integer Intege
I'm writing the documentation for math/array, and the examples all fail.
Here's a simple one:
@examples[#:eval untyped-eval
(array [0 1 2 3])]
The evaluator raises this error:
application: not a procedure;
expected a procedure that can be applied to arguments
give
(Perhaps this suggests a problem with making a macro depend on the shape of
parens around a sub-expression.)
On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:01 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> I'm writing the documentation for math/array, and the examples all fail.
> Here's a simple one:
>
> @examples[#:eval untyped-ev
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> How does compare to builtin mutable hashes?
>
The following code represents a rough hashtable equivalent of what my rb
code would be enabling (quick search for word by position):
;; We might be curious as to the overhead of the
18 matches
Mail list logo
