When you run
#lang racket
'#(1 1 1)
the output is
'#(1 1 1)
When you run
#lang scheme
'#(1 1 1)
the output is
#(1 1 1)
The difference in output (i.e., whether there's a leading quote) is
because the `racket' and `scheme' languages arrange different run-time
configuration of printin
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> The `racket' (and `racket/base') language adds a
> `configure-runtime' submodule to a module body unless there's already
> an immediate declaration (i.e., not under `begin' and not introduced by
> a macro).
Does that mean that if it *is* unde
At Tue, 7 May 2013 07:31:36 -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > The `racket' (and `racket/base') language adds a
> > `configure-runtime' submodule to a module body unless there's already
> > an immediate declaration (i.e., not under `begin' and not
I realize that I should get a --disable-jit version running before
tackling this, but since I stumbled into it last night...
In jitinline.c, at line 1834, there is code for generating a JIT-ted
version of char->integer. I think I understand all of it, except for
line 1851:
1851: jit_movr_p(dest,
I think you're right: line 1851 is useless.
I added line 1851 weeks after writing the surrounding code. At the time
that I added line 1851, the real repair was changing line 1859 to use
`dest' as the destination. I didn't pay enough attention to see that
the slow path is a failure path, so no resu
Thank you!
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think you're right: line 1851 is useless.
>
> I added line 1851 weeks after writing the surrounding code. At the time
> that I added line 1851, the real repair was changing line 1859 to use
> `dest' as the destination. I didn't p
6 matches
Mail list logo
