Re: [racket-dev] PLaneT(2): Single vs multi-collection packages

2013-06-02 Thread Laurent
Ah, that's cool. Looking forward to it! And the in-url thing would be useful indeed for gists for example. Laurent On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Yes, I really want to try and get to look into doing this. The thing > is that multi-collection libraries are going to be a

Re: [racket-dev] PLaneT(2): Single vs multi-collection packages

2013-06-02 Thread Eli Barzilay
To clarify, because of reasons that I won't go into on the list, the actual chances of me getting this implemented (and of such a change being accepted) are pretty much in the area of "slim to none". TBH, the chances of implementing an `in-url' are low too, but they're probably higher than going i

Re: [racket-dev] PLaneT(2): Single vs multi-collection packages

2013-06-02 Thread Laurent
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > To clarify, because of reasons that I won't go into on the list, the > actual chances of me getting this implemented (and of such a change > being accepted) are pretty much in the area of "slim to none". That's a bummer. At first sight I'd h