FWIW, I agree that handle-evt is more generally useful than wrap-evt
(programming with breaks gets tricky and would require it's own setup).
You can use things like @interaction[] to run and typeset examples; does
that help?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/eval.html?q=interaction#%28form._%2
Short question:
Is there a way to separate the gui-requiring parts of plot from the
non-gui-requiring parts?
Long question:
Many people have expressed pleasant surprise with the plot-evaluating
ability of the racket pastebin Sam and I are working on.
Most of the effort is due to scribble's nice s
On 10/08/2013 11:22 AM, Stephen Chang wrote:
Short question:
Is there a way to separate the gui-requiring parts of plot from the
non-gui-requiring parts?
Long question:
Many people have expressed pleasant surprise with the plot-evaluating
ability of the racket pastebin Sam and I are working on.
I think it is worth having a plot/pict or pict/plot library that doesn't
depend on racket/GUI/base (or maybe it would be better to disentangle
snips). In any case, we have many others such libraries that turn on
avoiding racket/gui/base for exactly this reason.
Robby
On Tuesday, October 8, 2013,
4 matches
Mail list logo
