Re: [racket-dev] Release process for split repos

2015-01-27 Thread Vincent St-Amour
That sounds good to me. One concern, though: it looks like recreating old releases requires that all the participating repos (1) still exist, (2) have the same name/location, and (3) still have the release tags. I'm not too worried about (1) and (3), but I could see (2) happening if, e.g., a packa

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: Sandbox evaluation problem - files with comment boxes

2015-01-27 Thread Matthew Flatt
Yes, it's a bug in v6.1.1. I've just pushed a repair for the next build. Do you need a workaround for v6.1.1? Your variant that sets `sandbox-namespace-specs` is what I would have tried; unfortunately, that runs into a second bug in v6.1.1 that I recently fixed. If you need a workaround other than

Re: [racket-dev] Sandbox evaluation problem - files with comment boxes

2015-01-27 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Ok, thank you! I can use the latest build. --- nadeem On Tuesday, January 27, 2015, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Yes, it's a bug in v6.1.1. I've just pushed a repair for the next > build. > > Do you need a workaround for v6.1.1? Your variant that sets > `sandbox-namespace-specs` is what I would have t