Re: [racket-dev] define-for-syntax optional/keyword arguments

2010-06-09 Thread Casey Klein
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: At Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:23:54 -0500, Casey Klein wrote: `define-for-syntax' doesn't allow optional or keyword arguments, although the documentation suggests it should. I tried to fix this myself, but I'm getting a

Re: [racket-dev] discussion of the release

2010-06-09 Thread Jens Axel Søgaard
2010/6/9 Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu:  4. We should have a Try Racket in the browser link, like this: http://tryruby.org/ Perhaps the IRC-bot thingie could be used as a starting point? -- Jens Axel Søgaard _ For list-related

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] [scribble] rendering syntax

2010-06-09 Thread John Clements
On Jun 9, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Eric Tanter etan...@dcc.uchile.cl wrote: Yes, Carl got my point right. And yes, that's like showing square brackets in the stepper ;) Right now, the two cases are slightly asymmetric, since there's a

[racket-dev] Bug site

2010-06-09 Thread Carl Eastlund
The top of the current bug report page currently says: See the Racket site for up-to-date information, because PLT Scheme is now Racket. (Why?) This page is for compatiblity and historical reference only. We should probably have a bug report site that gives users a little more confidence.