[racket-dev] Racket runs on 64-bit ubuntu, right?

2010-10-05 Thread John Clements
I have a student who hasn't succeeded in running compiled-from-source DrRacket on 64-bit ubuntu. Specifically, he claims it dumps core with SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x4 Aborted on startup. I have *not* tried to verify this myself, so he's almost certainly made a minor

Re: [racket-dev] Racket runs on 64-bit ubuntu, right?

2010-10-05 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:26:04 -0700, John Clements wrote: I have a student who hasn't succeeded in running compiled-from-source DrRacket on 64-bit ubuntu. Specifically, he claims it dumps core with SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x4 Aborted on startup. I think this is a

[racket-dev] single-instantiation trick: kludgy workaround for planet packages?

2010-10-05 Thread John Clements
A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to allow single-instantiation of a modules. I'm now trying to do this for a planet package, and it looks like I have to change the required module from being a relative to being an absolute path. That is: (require (prefix-in

Re: [racket-dev] single-instantiation trick: kludgy workaround for planet packages?

2010-10-05 Thread Carl Eastlund
John, See this-package-in, found both in the cce/scheme planet package and in unstable/require. If you write (prefix-in drlink: (this-package-in private/drracket-link)) you should get the behavior you want, and it should be less fragile than the explicit planet path. Carl Eastlund On Tue, Oct

Re: [racket-dev] single-instantiation trick: kludgy workaround for planet packages?

2010-10-05 Thread Ryan Culpepper
On 10/05/2010 03:59 PM, John Clements wrote: A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to allow single-instantiation of a modules. I'm now trying to do this for a planet package, and it looks like I have to change the required module from being a relative to being an

Re: [racket-dev] single-instantiation trick: kludgy workaround for planet packages?

2010-10-05 Thread Ryan Culpepper
I seem to have mangled my response right before sending it. Here it is again, hopefully straightened out. On 10/05/2010 03:59 PM, John Clements wrote: A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to allow single-instantiation of a modules. I'm now trying to do this for a

Re: [racket-dev] single-instantiation trick: kludgy workaround for planet packages?

2010-10-05 Thread John Clements
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: I seem to have mangled my response right before sending it. Here it is again, hopefully straightened out. On 10/05/2010 03:59 PM, John Clements wrote: A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to allow

Re: [racket-dev] single-instantiation trick: kludgy workaround for planet packages?

2010-10-05 Thread Ryan Culpepper
John Clements wrote: On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: I seem to have mangled my response right before sending it. Here it is again, hopefully straightened out. On 10/05/2010 03:59 PM, John Clements wrote: A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to