Re: [racket-dev] expected timing difference between fft-complex-forward and fft-complex-radix2-forward?

On Oct 18, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > When I first ran with vectors of 8192, I got exactly the opposite - the > radix-2 version was much slower (although still < 500ms). But, when I looked, > the longer time was almost exclusively GC - it just happen to hit that > particular call

[racket-dev] Commit notifications

I just made a change to the commit notification script -- in addition to sending the email to `comm...@racket-lang.org', it also sends it to the committers (both the committers and the commit authors). This means that if you push a commit done by someone else, they'll get the notification email to

Re: [racket-dev] expected timing difference between fft-complex-forward and fft-complex-radix2-forward?

When I first ran with vectors of 8192, I got exactly the opposite - the radix-2 version was much slower (although still < 500ms). But, when I looked, the longer time was almost exclusively GC - it just happen to hit that particular call. When I put a (collect-garbage) before each call, they were al