On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
It wouldn't hurt to include a little script that downloads the correct
versions of the files from racket-lang.org somewhere and puts
At Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:44:54 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
At least for the JFP file, it's pretty clearly a copyright violation
for us to distribute the file at all -- on the web page or elsewhere.
We'd have to download it from the CUP site.
For the ACM file, I emailed the contact email
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org wrote:
Robby Findler wrote at 02/19/2011 08:00 AM:
But I'm starting to think that Matthew's solution is easiest. Lets just
punt.
FWIW, I see additional reasons to, as Matthew suggested, *not* bundle
third-party La/TeX
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:44:54 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
At least for the JFP file, it's pretty clearly a copyright violation
for us to distribute the file at all -- on the web page or elsewhere.
We'd have to
Does it seem okay to provide a script that downloads the .cls file
from the jfp website and tuck it into the (already installed)
distribution (presumably in a user-specific place)?
If so, then we can at least set up a drdr test that does that and
checks to see if scribble produces exactly the
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Does it seem okay to provide a script that downloads the .cls file
from the jfp website and tuck it into the (already installed)
distribution (presumably in a user-specific place)?
Yes, this is a well-known
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Does it seem okay to provide a script that downloads the .cls file
from the jfp website and tuck it into the (already installed)
I've batch my responses to yesterday's questions together.
As a general note, I'd like to have my document be an accurate
reflection of what I should do when I start coding, so if you think I
should update it to clarify the answers to these questions, please let
me know. I'm blinded a bit by my
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I've batch my responses to yesterday's questions together.
As a general note, I'd like to have my document be an accurate
reflection of what I should do when I start coding, so if you think I
should update it to
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
It looks to me like you there is relevant, important metadata that
you're making someone fold into an implicit place instead of an
explicit one.
Will you have a convention for these? What if I decide to call
An hour and a half ago, Robby Findler wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Does it seem okay to provide a script that downloads the .cls file
from the jfp
On Feb 19, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
I have not, although one of the JFP editors is on this list :)
I have routinely provided the JFP style file from my own web page,
and I am pretty sure JFP knows that I do so.
Of course, I am the content EiC not the commercial editor.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
For SIGPLAN I will say that I routinely have to change the 'latest'
download that students use for their drafts so that I get one-column
versions of the papers that I can extensively edit. I would really
prefer
I think that the versioning problem is an important and hard one, and
the obvious first place to turn this infrastructure work into a
research result. Racket gives you a significant opportunity that
others would not have (for a certain class of solutions, at least).
Even better, we have
14 matches
Mail list logo
