On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:46:06 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> I just meant that
>>
>> (sync (future (lambda () ...)))
>>
>> should be the same as
>>
>> (touch (future (lambda () ...)))
>>
>> or is that hard for future-safety reasons as we
At Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:46:06 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> I just meant that
>
> (sync (future (lambda () ...)))
>
> should be the same as
>
> (touch (future (lambda () ...)))
>
> or is that hard for future-safety reasons as well?
I'm not convinced that it makes sense. When you create a
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
>> wrote:
>>> Not a bug or crash, but it would be nice if a `place' was an event, in
>>> the sense of `evt?'. Come to th
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>> Not a bug or crash, but it would be nice if a `place' was an event, in
>> the sense of `evt?'. Come to think of it, this would be good for
>> `future' as well.
>
> FWIW, this
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Not a bug or crash, but it would be nice if a `place' was an event, in
> the sense of `evt?'. Come to think of it, this would be good for
> `future' as well.
FWIW, this will probably never happen for futures, due to future-safe
issues
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Kevin Tew wrote:
> Being able to sync on when they terminate?
> Thats pretty easy to add, I should do it.
>
> Place currently is an event you can sync on, but it becomes ready when a
> message arrives. Not when it terminates.
Oh, in that case I don't see a proble
6 matches
Mail list logo
