Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org writes:
11 hours ago, Michael Sperber wrote:
I still need Stephen Chang's commit to be merged over:
commit 8956364387fa25ffeb51e50fc1a83c20fd88af32
Author: Stephen Chang stchang...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Jul 24 12:18:09 2011 -0400
change recon-val in
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones to...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
the VM would need to be changed as part of that work?
There is nothing you can't do with a brave heart and a disassembler.
In other words, I've
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I was recently telling some people that I thought 'Ruby on Rails' was
mostly an ORM plus a set of default dispatching rules with convenient
ways of extending the defaults.
I agree, though I don't have much RoR
On Jul 28, 2011 7:26 AM, Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones to...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
the VM would need to be changed as part of that work?
There is nothing you
On Robby and Matthew's suggestion that I look into implementing the
primitives of racket/draw, I took a look at the implementation. If I
understand this correctly, it looks like I need to implement the
methods of the drawing context interface, right?
(If so, there's one obstacle that I'll need
I am trying to compile racket for a different architecture that libffi
is not ported to so I tried to use --disable-libffi but foreign/libffi
still gets configured. A) should that be happening and B) is there a way
around it?
$ ../configure --disable-libffi --host=x86
...
configure: error: libffi
Ah it was --disable-foreign.
--disable-libffi is to use the bundled ffi instead of the host one, or
something.
On 07/28/2011 11:42 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
I am trying to compile racket for a different architecture that libffi
is not ported to so I tried to use --disable-libffi but
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
On Robby and Matthew's suggestion that I look into implementing the
primitives of racket/draw, I took a look at the implementation. If I
understand this correctly, it looks like I need to implement the
methods of the drawing context interface,
8 matches
Mail list logo