On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Two days ago, Casey Klein wrote:
Oh, I see. I like that. How do you feel about using the same style
for contracts? For example:
(define-judgment-form nats
#:mode (sum I I O)
#:contract (sum n n n)
Not a party
[Moved to the dev list.]
At Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:25:00 -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Feature request... I'd *really* like to see compile-time checking of
keyword arguments whenever that is possible.
If compiler knows what procedure will be called, and the procedure uses
keyword args in the
At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:12:36 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Another possibility is to redirect the `set!' on `f' to the
underlying `proc', and somehow make the optimized call to `core'
happen only when `proc' is never mutated. Due to the order of macro
expansion, whether `f' is mutated
Ah, right. Rats.
Robby
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:12:36 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Another possibility is to redirect the `set!' on `f' to the
underlying `proc', and somehow make the optimized call to `core'
happen
I love DrDr, but there's a small thing that annoys me about it.
Some tests are prone to intermittent failures. For example, some
benchmarks need to create a file, and several benchmarks share the
same file, which leads to race conditions. Similarly, some DrRacket
tests sometimes fail for focus
I like the two-times-in-a-row thought.
FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
I think the drracket test suites are special because they fail
not-so-often and I don't actually know how to fix them. If either of
those weren't true then I'd say they should just not run in
PS: I'm also happy if this class of tests only emails the responsible
person, and not the pusher.
Robby
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I like the two-times-in-a-row thought.
FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
I
At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:59:24 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
Some of these I can try to fix. But I don't think all intermittent
failures fit in this category.
I think the drracket test suites are special because they fail
not-so-often
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:59:24 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
Some of these I can try to fix. But I don't think all intermittent
failures fit in this
At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 11:06:30 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
At Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:59:24 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
FWIW, please try to avoid race conditions of the second kind.
Some of these I can try to fix.
Another request: could DrDr process the latest push first? Its a little
annoying to get emails for tests that failed when the latest push fixes
them but DrDr is so far behind. Is there any benefit to testing all the
intermediate pushes?
On 08/08/2011 09:56 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
I love
This is a rare event (playing catchup like this) so I think it is
probably best if we just let it catch up. Should be just a couple of
more days (maybe a week) by my sketchy guesstimationizing.
Robby
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Another request: could
Could DrDr say This build is not the latest or The latest push is
234234?
On 08/08/2011 11:37 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
It is useful to test all of them to find out when errors start. It
doesn't do the newest first, because then the calculation of new
issue wouldn't make any sense, because you
Your wish is my command.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
PS: I'm also happy if this class of tests only emails the responsible
person, and not the pusher.
Robby
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
I noticed this functionality just now.. thanks a lot!
On 08/08/2011 12:38 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
Your wish is my command.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
PS: I'm also happy if this class of tests only emails the responsible
person, and not
15 matches
Mail list logo
