You might try running science-test.rkt multiple times and see if it fails.
It's the simulation collection where I see the problem mostly. It uses the
differential equation solver from the science collection, which is the only
place I know of that uses boxes, but there may be others. I was using
Win
At Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:18:36 -0600, Doug Williams wrote:
> I reported a problem a few weeks back that keeps me from using 5.1.2 (and
> now 5.1.3). Matthew believes it is due to an optimizer bug with boxes.
> Fortunately, 5.1.1 works, but we're stuck there. I tried the latest nightly
> build this mo
Daylight savings time! Nevermind. Sorry for the noise.
Robby
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Is it a bug that this:
>
> (/ (- (find-seconds 0 0 0 5 12 2011)
> (find-seconds 0 0 0 28 8 2011))
> 60 60 24)
>
> doesn't return an even integer? (I get 99 & 1/24th).
Is it a bug that this:
(/ (- (find-seconds 0 0 0 5 12 2011)
(find-seconds 0 0 0 28 8 2011))
60 60 24)
doesn't return an even integer? (I get 99 & 1/24th).
Robby
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.or
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:06:28PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:34:30AM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > Right --- the Racket JIT definitely does not support PPC in 64-bit
> > mode.
> >
> > The Racket PPC JIT is enabled on Linux when `powerpc' is #defined at
> > build
I reported a problem a few weeks back that keeps me from using 5.1.2 (and
now 5.1.3). Matthew believes it is due to an optimizer bug with boxes.
Fortunately, 5.1.1 works, but we're stuck there. I tried the latest nightly
build this morning and the error is still there. [That was mainly just a
frien
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:42:10AM -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two days ago, James Vega wrote:
> >
> > Since I've generally had more luck using the cgc GC on less
> > mainstream systems, I set the build to use that for PowerPC and let
> > it be in case things changed and it started working.
>
>
It's not the default because most examples don't need pretty printing,
and initializing a sandbox with the pretty printer takes twice as long.
At Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:05:51 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Shouldn't the pretty-print version be the default one? How often would I want
> to writ
This was already a part of the Style sheet draft, but I have taken Eli's
message and refined the section on commits.
On Aug 27, 2011, at 10:04 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> I see that it's becoming semi common to write commit messages that
> look like:
>
> | some quick description
> | more
Shouldn't the pretty-print version be the default one? How often would I want
to write documentation that doesn't pretty print?
-- Matthias
On Aug 27, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:22:12 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>> When you run this program, you
I have a number of odds and ends that I've been un-mothballing and moving to
typed/racket which are currently in various states of entropy: crypto sha1,
md5, sha256, hmac-xxx, AWS, S3, Amazon Product API, HTTP client library and
a few odds and ends.It was all originally R6RS / Larceny so the b
Hi Neil,
I've been using the new plot library for visualizing some benchmark
results in three dimensions (# threads, amount of work, throughput).
It's very easy to use, and the interactive 3d plots are great. I also
plan to use the PDF export for my next paper. Thanks for making this
available!
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:34:30AM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Right --- the Racket JIT definitely does not support PPC in 64-bit
> mode.
>
> The Racket PPC JIT is enabled on Linux when `powerpc' is #defined at
> build time. Is `powerpc' #defined for the 64-bit build, perhaps in
> addition to `p
Two days ago, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> On 26/08/11 17:55, Robby Findler wrote:
> > There are plenty of warnings when you build under windows.
> >
>
> oh... :-/
> If the problem is windows then I don't think I will be able to help
> since I don't have access to a windows box at home.
You can see th
14 matches
Mail list logo