On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
I introduced templates today. Almost as if on cue, one student asked
whether he could use else instead of (cons? l). I told them I was
going to make a MORAL judgment about why it was EVIL, and spent ten
minutes talking about all
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:42:10AM -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Two days ago, James Vega wrote:
Since I've generally had more luck using the cgc GC on less
mainstream systems, I set the build to use that for PowerPC and let
it be in case things changed and it started working.
This is a
At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:44:50 -0600, Kevin Tew wrote:
If you would like document the fact that cstructs are generative only up
to version 5.1.3. I think that improve the docs.
I think the right next step is for you (Kevin) to update
doc/release-notes/racket/HISTORY.txt to describe the change.
At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:10:44 -0400, James Vega wrote:
mips and ia64 both fail with unaligned access, although in different
places.
ia64's build failure
I think Racket won't work on ia64 because we never worked out how to
deal with its multiple stacks.
mips' build failure
It looks like the call in C might have been in a thread other than the
thread where Racket was started. In that case, when scheme_post_sema()
tries to cooperate with the GC, then it would end up with a NULL
pointer for the Racket GC information of the current thread.
In particular, since you're
On Sep 17, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
It looks like the call in C might have been in a thread other than the
thread where Racket was started. In that case, when scheme_post_sema()
tries to cooperate with the GC, then it would end up with a NULL
pointer for the Racket GC
I'll do that.
Kevin
On 09/17/2011 07:53 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:44:50 -0600, Kevin Tew wrote:
If you would like document the fact that cstructs are generative only up
to version 5.1.3. I think that improve the docs.
I think the right next step is for you (Kevin) to
Disregard unless interested: crash while running program, drracket
#8e5bb730b369b169821695e1b3216d68a8d71d64 from Friday 16th.
Process: racket [11531]
Path:/Users/clements/plt/bin/racket
Identifier: racket
Version: ??? (???)
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
I think you are missing a test case here.
Robby
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:39 PM, gmarc...@racket-lang.org wrote:
gmarceau has updated `master' from 14014b3d36 to 9b49de16e7.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/14014b3d36..9b49de16e7
=[ 1 Commits
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Whoops, I see we lost the mailing list at some point in this thread.
We're back now.
If the former, then those are the directories that DrRacket
intentionally doens't compile (and those are the ones that I'd
10 matches
Mail list logo