-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/11 20:30, Robby Findler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Marijn hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Hi Robby,
On 10/20/11 18:15, Robby Findler wrote:
Generally, the menukey-c, menukey-v,
On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
Checklist items for the v5.2 release
(using the v5.1.900.1 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
* Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com
- Rackunit Tests
- SRFI Tests
- Ensure that all claimed srfi's are in the installer and they all
load into racket or drracket (as appropriate)
Done.
N.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Marijn hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/11 20:30, Robby Findler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Marijn hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Hi Robby,
On 10/20/11
Can I help make a test case for this?
Robby
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, sper...@racket-lang.org wrote:
sperber has updated `master' from 0d642cf976 to 36d3745d4c.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/0d642cf976..36d3745d4c
=[ 1 Commits
I'm getting occasional (non-reliably-reproducible) seg faults when calling a C
routine that copies bits from one place to another.
My working assumption is that the buffer is getting moved by GC in between the
computation of the pointers and the actual ffi invocation, though that's a
fairly
At Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:10:03 -0700, John Clements wrote:
I'm getting occasional (non-reliably-reproducible) seg faults when calling a
C
routine that copies bits from one place to another.
My working assumption is that the buffer is getting moved by GC in between
the
computation of the
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
In case it helps, I'm thining of adding something like the following to
the docs:
For the following scenarios, assume
* A `define-mylib' form of the sort that `ffi/unsafe/define' would
produce.
* A C function f() that expects a
I've run into a few difficulties in building a language whose modules
are expanded primarily through local-expand. I thought I'd share them
in the interest of improving Racket's expansion mechanisms in the long
run (or if they can be fixed in the short run, even better). So far I
don't believe
At Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:30:44 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
In case it helps, I'm thining of adding something like the following to
the docs: [...]
I didn't find a good place for it, and then somehow I ended up adding a
tutorial to the FFI docs. It's a start, at least.
10 matches
Mail list logo