On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:02:46AM -0800, Pauan wrote:
Yes that is exactly it. The rationale is as ozzloy said: right now you
needto use something like #px\\d to match the string \\5.
That's a lot ofbackslashes!
In other languages that support regexps, there's usually a way of
You need to set the 'responsible' property using the 'git props'
command that Eli has added for your new collection, probably to
'ntoronto'.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:22 AM, ntoro...@racket-lang.org wrote:
4012373 Neil Toronto ntoro...@racket-lang.org 2011-11-28 23:01
:
| Started icon
I see two sequences:
-below ;; disables up to
-above ;; here; disables up to -below and re-enables tests
or
-above ;; disables everything up to here and enables tests up to
-below ;; here; disables tests below.
Anything else? -- Matthias
On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Robby Findler
That would also work.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I think we're over-complexifying the whole situation.
Perhaps we should allow only one of these things to
appear in the definitions buffer. We're talking about
novice programmers. I
I'm currently proctoring the freshmen's lab on inexact numbers and was curious
how to denote subnormal numbers in Racket.
Turns out that's not possible, since there is no underflow. Why does Racket
follow the old standard of representing underflow with inexact zero?
I imagine changing it now
1. Everyone should acknowledge the JWZ quote, Some people, when
confronted with a problem, think 'I know, I'll use regular expressions.'
Now they have two problems. Regular expressions are Perl's hammer that
makes most problems look like a nail.
2. Before someone spends too much time putting
I can't answer the question about underflow. But if you don't mind
installing a nightly build of Racket, you get the (currently
undocumented) module `unstable/flonum', which exports these:
flonum-bit-field
bit-field-flonum
flonum-ordinal; number of flonums away from 0 (+ or -)
On 2011 Nov 29, at 18:14, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
1. Everyone should acknowledge the JWZ quote, Some people, when
confronted with a problem, think 'I know, I'll use regular expressions.'
Now they have two problems. Regular expressions are Perl's hammer that
makes most problems look like a
Hi,
While trying to build libmysterx using VisualStudio 2010 with
Debug configuration for x64 I got a linker error saying:
fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'x64' conflicts with target
machine type 'X86'
The error seems related to the fact that the Debug configuration for
subproject
On 11/29/2011 4:10 PM, Antonio Menezes Leitao wrote:
Is this the correct configuration? What
do you usually do when you need to debug Racket internals (particularly,
mysterx)?
Personally, I debug it in optimized no-symbols no-debugging mode,
because I've had little success any other way.
10 matches
Mail list logo
