This looks useful to me.
I think this belongs in `unstable/sequence' for now, with the other
new sequence constructors.
I'll merge it.
Thanks for the patch!
Vincent
At Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:47:44 -0500,
David Vanderson wrote:
I only got one comment (thanks John), so I'm resending for more
Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
My hunch is that I forgot my meta-meta-lessons from the 1980s. Back then
the standard argument for lazy programming was that 'the regular lambda
calculus is uniform and easy to use and you never have to think about
when substitution works'.
On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Jim Wise wrote:
Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
I have not read Bob's blog, but Bob and I arrived at this
conclusion at about the same time and we discussed it extensively
during my sabbatical at CMU in 93/94. -- I am not at all surprised
This crash showed up again recently (thanks DrDr!), and this time I
believe I've fixed the real problem: a bytes object that pointed into
storage owned by another bytes object. The fix was to allocate the
storage as 'atomic-interior instead of 'atomic.
Ryan
On 11/13/2011 02:28 PM, Ryan
4 matches
Mail list logo