On Mar 27, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> we should consider otherwise simplifying some of these identifiers.
That's very high on my list of goals for another, related experiment I have in
mind. I know that this would remove the title of 'world champion in longest
identifier names'
FWIW...
* I have no strong opinion on whether it would be worthwhile, if done in
a backward-compatible way.
* If done in a *non*-backward-compatible way, it might be a headache. I
know of systems in production with millions of lines of PLT/Racket code,
and -- although PLT/Racket have been p
Bug report 12652 reminded me of a topic that I brought up a while back, that I
tried to incorporate into the Style Guide, and that I forgot to re-introduce
here.
Background: a lot of people think that consistency in naming,
signature/contract, and functionality (for methods and functions) is
3 matches
Mail list logo
