Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.3

2012-07-28 Thread Eli Barzilay
Is it possible that this is something that is resolved by a forced refresh? if not, what's tthe url is not found? On Wednesday, Doug Williams wrote: The download page still failed with the same error. The static page worked fine. On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Ryan Culpepper

Re: [racket-dev] racket-5.2.900.1-20120725 read ill-formed code error ?

2012-07-28 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Matthew Flatt wrote at 07/26/2012 06:36 PM: I've pushed a repair. Thanks for the report! Thanks, Matthew. Today, I plan to run a large pile of code through the 20120727 pre-release. Neil V. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.3

2012-07-28 Thread Doug Williams
It was working on the same machine the next day. So, it may have been a cache issue or some other transient. On Saturday, July 28, 2012, Eli Barzilay wrote: Is it possible that this is something that is resolved by a forced refresh? if not, what's tthe url is not found? On Wednesday, Doug

[racket-dev] possible 5.2.900.1 bug involving rest argument

2012-07-28 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Looks like a minor compiler/optimizer bug in Friday's 5.2.900.1 pre-release. I haven't yet found a simpler test case, but you can reproduce by installing a particular PLaneT package as shown below. The line 1275 it's complaining about is the following, which starts a procedure definition

[racket-dev] Racket 5.3 pre-release impressions?

2012-07-28 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Regarding Racket 5.3, I am more cautious than I recall being about a previous Racket minor version release. The information I have so far is mixed, rather that overwhelmingly reassuring. If anyone has comments on their sense of 5.3 reliability at this point, that might help me. Some good

Re: [racket-dev] Racket 5.3 pre-release impressions?

2012-07-28 Thread Neil Van Dyke
FWIW, I just tested 16 or so additional PLaneT packages in DrRacket 5.3 pre-release, and no problems. Neil Van Dyke wrote at 07/28/2012 02:56 PM: Regarding Racket 5.3, I am more cautious than I recall being about a previous Racket minor version release. The information I have so far is

Re: [racket-dev] Racket 5.3 pre-release impressions?

2012-07-28 Thread Doug Williams
I've tried all of my packages and had one major snag that Matthew thinks he has fixed. For my large simulations, it seems to execute faster, but that is just an impression. Many of them are actually constrained by quick and dirty plots that may be rendering tens or hundreds of thousands of points.

Re: [racket-dev] testing for v5.3

2012-07-28 Thread Matthew Flatt
I haven't been able to replicate this crash on a NetBSD 6.0_BETA2 i386 install. Does it crash consistently for you? Did you provide any arguments to `configure'? Thanks! At Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:55:07 +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote: Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu writes: Just a reminder that

Re: [racket-dev] testing for v5.3

2012-07-28 Thread Aleksej Saushev
Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu writes: I haven't been able to replicate this crash on a NetBSD 6.0_BETA2 i386 install. Does it crash consistently for you? Did you provide any arguments to `configure'? Sure. --enable-pthread --prefix=/usr/pkg --build=i486--netbsdelf --mandir=/usr/pkg/man

Re: [racket-dev] possible 5.2.900.1 bug involving rest argument

2012-07-28 Thread Eli Barzilay
6 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote: Looks like a minor compiler/optimizer bug in Friday's 5.2.900.1 pre-release. I haven't yet found a simpler test case, but you can reproduce by installing a particular PLaneT package as shown below. The line 1275 it's complaining about is the following,

Re: [racket-dev] possible 5.2.900.1 bug involving rest argument

2012-07-28 Thread Robby Findler
I believe Ryan fixed this a few hours ago. He may be waiting for a release build before commenting. Robby On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: 6 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote: Looks like a minor compiler/optimizer bug in Friday's 5.2.900.1 pre-release. I