Re: [racket-dev] Changing call/cc

2012-09-03 Thread Asumu Takikawa
On 2012-09-04 00:45:05 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > would still be enough for TR, but shouldn't affect dynamic wind uses > because the prompts being different should imply that all dynamic winds > handlers would be run anyway. Nevermind, this appears to actually be false as the following counter

Re: [racket-dev] Changing call/cc

2012-09-03 Thread Asumu Takikawa
On 2012-09-04 00:45:05 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > I've attached a patch that implements something like what I described Stevie's Law: Emails you send that say "file attached" will never have the file attached. --Asumu >From a5eecb89c484f5dc643a085348dfef7885ddff26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Fro

Re: [racket-dev] Changing call/cc

2012-09-03 Thread Asumu Takikawa
On 2012-08-30 11:36:55 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > Sam and I discussed this some more, and we think it sounds workable and > will go and try to add it to the Redex model and see what tests fail. We > were concerned about one thing though: it sounds like this would modify > the behavior of `call/