[racket-dev] strange memory corruption with drracket

2012-10-31 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
With my latest fix to handling of the `Any` type, the following small program (also at https://gist.github.com/3991023) crashes drracket (I can't provoke the bug with plain racket): #lang racket/load (module m typed/racket (define: v : Any (exn "" (current-continuation-marks))) (provide v))

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [DrDr] R25581 (timeout 2) (unclean 1) (stderr 3) (changes 59)

2012-10-31 Thread Burke Fetscher
That's a test that generates a bunch of random terms and checks some properties on them, which is why it might fail non-deterministically. It could be that there's a problem with term generation that's only shows up very rarely. I'll see if I can replicate it to see what's going on. Burke O

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [DrDr] R25581 (timeout 2) (unclean 1) (stderr 3) (changes 59)

2012-10-31 Thread Robby Findler
Apparently it only fails occasionally (at least it passes for me when I just tried it twice and it didn't fail the last time in drdr). Probably we should instrument it to see what is going on when it fails. Robby On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Danny Yoo wrote: > Does anyone know why one of th

[racket-dev] Fwd: [DrDr] R25581 (timeout 2) (unclean 1) (stderr 3) (changes 59)

2012-10-31 Thread Danny Yoo
Does anyone know why one of the tests in DrDr is failing? http://drdr.racket-lang.org/25581/collects/redex/tests/gen-test.rkt -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:48 PM Subject: [DrDr] R25581 (timeout 2) (unclean 1) (stderr 3) (changes 59) To: d...@racket-

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #25575: master branch updated

2012-10-31 Thread Robby Findler
Maybe in a while (lets see if my change works out). Robby On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Is it appropriate then to deprecate the library and > to move the code eventually into racket/control-examples? > > > > On Oct 31, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > >>

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #25575: master branch updated

2012-10-31 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Is it appropriate then to deprecate the library and to move the code eventually into racket/control-examples? On Oct 31, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Matthias Felleisen > wrote: >> At some point someone (Asumu?) mentioned that this is the only >>

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #25575: master branch updated

2012-10-31 Thread Robby Findler
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > At some point someone (Asumu?) mentioned that this is the only > use of coroutine in our code base. Is this correct? grep suggests that there are no more (none on planet either). FWIW, this is still "morally" a coroutine in the sense t

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #25575: master branch updated

2012-10-31 Thread Matthias Felleisen
At some point someone (Asumu?) mentioned that this is the only use of coroutine in our code base. Is this correct? On Oct 30, 2012, at 11:12 PM, ro...@racket-lang.org wrote: > robby has updated `master' from 195cbe832c to f07c8cf490. > http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/195cbe832c..f07c8cf490