Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26316: master branch updated
The repair that I thought was for 32-bit mode can also affect 64-bit mode, especially under Linux (as opposed to Mac OS X, due to the different ways they use the address space). So, I think this is now fixed, and DrDr successfully built with the repair. At Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:27:48 -0500, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2013-02-19 10:44:47 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > I forgot to check 32-bit mode, and I see a problem there. Are you using > > a 32-bit or 64-bit build? > > 64-bit. > > Cheers, > Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Potential bug with icons in head
On 19/02, Robby Findler wrote: > I'm seeing it too. Unfortunately not reproducibly, so I haven't tried a git > bisect. It would be nice to try, tho. > > Robby > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > > > On 2013-02-19 19:19:24 +0100, Philippe Mechaï wrote: > > >I've just compiled latest Racket version and found out icons are not > > >displayed correctly as shown in attached screenshot. > > >Please tell me if I can be of any help to diagnose this problem. > > > > FWIW, I've had this problem too on a 64-bit Linux machine. > > > > Cheers, > > Asumu > > _ > > Racket Developers list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > As I forgot to tell I'm testing on a 64 bit Debian Sid machine Additionnal info: - No problem when using stop-sign-icons from images/icons/misc from the REPL - No problem when using a compiled-bitmap of the very same icon - Error icons are only displayed in the REPL after I click the "Run" button once Not sure where to look from now on _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
[racket-dev] I'd like to add a sidebar link to all documentation versions in docs.racket-lang.org.
I always have a difficult time looking for the documentation for previous versions of Racket. For example, I wanted to compare API documentation for 5.2.1 vs. the latest. I visited: http://docs.racket-lang.org/ and immediately got stuck. I had no idea what to do next here. It turns out that prior versions of documentation are linked from the "Download" section: http://download.racket-lang.org/docs/ Preferably, this link should show up somewhere on the sidebar of the main documentation site. I'm proposing: https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/87a5280b13f7092f730145028fcbdea8a8cc5519 Is this ok? _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Potential bug with icons in head
I'm seeing it too. Unfortunately not reproducibly, so I haven't tried a git bisect. It would be nice to try, tho. Robby On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2013-02-19 19:19:24 +0100, Philippe Mechaï wrote: > >I've just compiled latest Racket version and found out icons are not > >displayed correctly as shown in attached screenshot. > >Please tell me if I can be of any help to diagnose this problem. > > FWIW, I've had this problem too on a 64-bit Linux machine. > > Cheers, > Asumu > _ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Potential bug with icons in head
On 2013-02-19 19:19:24 +0100, Philippe Mechaï wrote: >I've just compiled latest Racket version and found out icons are not >displayed correctly as shown in attached screenshot. >Please tell me if I can be of any help to diagnose this problem. FWIW, I've had this problem too on a 64-bit Linux machine. Cheers, Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26316: master branch updated
On 2013-02-19 10:44:47 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote: > I forgot to check 32-bit mode, and I see a problem there. Are you using > a 32-bit or 64-bit build? 64-bit. Cheers, Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
[racket-dev] Potential bug with icons in head
Hi, I've just compiled latest Racket version and found out icons are not displayed correctly as shown in attached screenshot. Please tell me if I can be of any help to diagnose this problem. Regards, Philippe <>_ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26316: master branch updated
I forgot to check 32-bit mode, and I see a problem there. Are you using a 32-bit or 64-bit build? At Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:29:57 -0500, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2013-02-19 10:48:21 -0500, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote: > > ca95129 Matthew Flatt 2013-02-19 08:02 > > : > > | JIT: inline `char->integer' and `integer->char' > > I think this commit broke the build for me. I get segfaults like this: > > raco setup: 7 making: ffi > SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x1386ad8 > Aborted > > And I also get errors from integer->char like this: > > integer->char: contract violation > expected: (and/c (integer-in 0 #x10) (not/c (integer-in #xD800 > #xDFFF))) > given: # > > I'll try getting a stack trace too. > > Cheers, > Asumu > _ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26316: master branch updated
On 2013-02-19 10:48:21 -0500, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote: > ca95129 Matthew Flatt 2013-02-19 08:02 > : > | JIT: inline `char->integer' and `integer->char' I think this commit broke the build for me. I get segfaults like this: raco setup: 7 making: ffi SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x1386ad8 Aborted And I also get errors from integer->char like this: integer->char: contract violation expected: (and/c (integer-in 0 #x10) (not/c (integer-in #xD800 #xDFFF))) given: # I'll try getting a stack trace too. Cheers, Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
