Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26372: master branch updated

2013-02-27 Thread Carl Eastlund
First of all, thanks very much, Matthew, for implementing this! This looks like a great feature to me. I have often been frustrated that users' data structures aren't easy to quote or to manipulate in macros in the same way as pairs or vectors; this should go a long way to improving the

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26372: master branch updated

2013-02-27 Thread J. Ian Johnson
I should mention that the literature on staged metaprogramming calls this cross-stage persistence, (CSP) so I second Carl's proposal of cross-phase. -Ian - Original Message - From: Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu To: Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk Cc: dev Developers

Re: [racket-dev] datalog tests failing on HEAD?

2013-02-27 Thread Jay McCarthy
The tests are run by running main.rkt, which has no rerrors when you run it. It is a bit strange that those errors happen when run that way, but I think it just means that eval should control the context of the sub-programs more. Jay On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Danny Yoo

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26372: master branch updated

2013-02-27 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:53:16 -0500 (EST), J. Ian Johnson wrote: I should mention that the literature on staged metaprogramming calls this cross-stage persistence, (CSP) so I second Carl's proposal of cross-phase. All module declarations are cross-phase persistent (unlike module

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26372: master branch updated

2013-02-27 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: Cross-phase-persistence-inducing would be an accurate description, but that's a mouthful. Is there a short variant that connects to existing terminology better than phase-collapsing? 1. cropping [seriously] 2. I would stay away from

Re: [racket-dev] `math' compilation time !!!

2013-02-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Sunday, Eli Barzilay wrote: According to my rough count (and running setup with a -j 1), compiling `math' takes 40% of the whole tree compilation. I'm surprised that nobody finds this disturbing. Maybe it was the lack of bangs in the subject. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x)

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-02-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
Yesterday, Asumu Takikawa wrote: On 2013-02-26 09:53:11 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: I have finally implemented a script that hacks the on-line doc pages. Currently, it does the following (and you can see the changes on the web now): Maybe I'm missing something, but the changes have been

Re: [racket-dev] Tweaked doc pages

2013-02-27 Thread Eli Barzilay
Just now, Eli Barzilay wrote: * The layout should have the main column centered. (I thought that it was fine initially if the left column is part of the contents.) BTW, resolving this should happen at the CSS level, perhaps just reorganizing them should make it work. But if not, then I

[racket-dev] gracket on retina

2013-02-27 Thread David Van Horn
Having recently upgraded to a retina display mac, I see the problem pointed out in this PR: http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=viewpr=12909 Is there some way for me to help? If pointed in the right direction, I can try to patch things. Short of that, I can be a guinea pig. David

Re: [racket-dev] gracket on retina

2013-02-27 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:31:06 -0500, David Van Horn wrote: Having recently upgraded to a retina display mac, I see the problem pointed out in this PR: http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=viewpr=12909 Is there some way for me to help? If pointed in the right direction, I can try

[racket-dev] A standard for testing Racket's libraries?

2013-02-27 Thread Danny Yoo
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote: The tests are run by running main.rkt, which has no rerrors when you run it. It is a bit strange that those errors happen when run that way, but I think it just means that eval should control the context of the

Re: [racket-dev] `math' compilation time !!!

2013-02-27 Thread Neil Toronto
On 02/27/2013 01:51 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: On Sunday, Eli Barzilay wrote: According to my rough count (and running setup with a -j 1), compiling `math' takes 40% of the whole tree compilation. I'm running my own timing tests. So far, I've got 917s (about 15 minutes) to compile the math