Yesterday, Michael Wilber wrote:
The Google search box seems a bit disorienting to me. Perhaps I just
learned Racket, say yesterday, and it's unclear what it provides
that isn't searched by the search box in the top middle. It might be
nice to integrate that with the results page somehow, like
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
I have the minimal things that I wanted in a working state now:
* Links to the PDF versions next to the version.
* A selection box for different versions of documents.
* A google custom search.
All of this is now
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:54 AM, mikel evins mev...@me.com wrote:
Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and more
apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and source files are
somehow mutually exclusive. They're not. Adding the ability to save and load
What about moving the google search to the search results page, saying
something like didn't find what you were looking for? Try a google-based
search. instead of having two searches next to each other in a somewhat
confusing way?
(I think someone else made this suggestion; apologies if I missed
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
There's no practical way to unify the two searches since they are
implemented in a completely different way all the way to how the end
user interacts with them.
Neither Racket's search nor Google's one report the
20 minutes ago, mikel evins wrote:
Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and
more apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and
source files are somehow mutually exclusive. They're not. Adding the
ability to save and load images does not subtract the
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Stephen Bloch bl...@adelphi.edu wrote:
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:54 AM, mikel evins mev...@me.com wrote:
Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and
more apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and source
files are
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Stephen Bloch bl...@adelphi.edu wrote:
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:54 AM, mikel evins mev...@me.com wrote:
Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and more
apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and source files
are
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
20 minutes ago, mikel evins wrote:
Rather than answer your questions directly, it seems much easier and
more apropos to address the underlying assumption that images and
source files are somehow mutually exclusive. They're
I like it.
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
I have the minimal things that I wanted in a working state now:
* Links to the PDF versions next to the version.
* A selection box for different versions of documents.
* A google custom search.
All of this is now
Four hours ago, mikel evins wrote:
On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Aha -- in that case, it seems that your image-based workflow is
not much different from working with just the sources *and* the
(byte-) compiled files that go with them, right?
On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Um, no, I don't think that this is similar.
Okay.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Four hours ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
I like it.
It's up now, at docs.racket-lang.org .
8 hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
What about moving the google search to the search results page,
saying something like didn't find what you were looking for? Try a
google-based search. instead of
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
They are already indexed, but it happens to be a very popular name so
there are tons of results before it. (Try searching for stxparam to
see that it works.)
Ooops. You are right. I gave up too soon.
14 matches
Mail list logo
