Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:52:21 -0600, Matthew Flatt mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said: Matthew I think the new system is as ready as it's going to get without Matthew further feedback, and my guess is that the problem hasn't been Matthew fixed. Can you check with

Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread James McCoy
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 04:17:10PM +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: I guess it depends on how one works. When there is no release or I want to package a git version of the project. I need to put a version number in the package spec file, that would make it possible to upgrade or

Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread Neil Toronto
On 07/13/2013 12:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: Here's a big-picture update of where we are in the new package system and the conversion of the Racket distribution to use packages. This message covers [lots of awesome stuff]... Thanks a ton for the update and clarifications, Matthew. I have one

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #27163: master branch updated

2013-07-18 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
I moved all of distributed places to a new package, which required the one change below. I'm not sure about whether this is a good idea, particularly because neither the `#:at` or `#:named` arguments to `dynamic-place` are mentioned at all in the documentation. Thoughts? Sam On Thu, Jul 18,

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #27163: master branch updated

2013-07-18 Thread Matthew Flatt
Well, I'm disappointed that the documentation did not get updated with the addition of `#:at' and `#:named'. With this change, does `raco exe' still work? I think `lazy-require' expands in a way that would require the `racket/place/distributed' module to be present when creating an executable

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #27163: master branch updated

2013-07-18 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: With this change, does `raco exe' still work? I think `lazy-require' expands in a way that would require the `racket/place/distributed' module to be present when creating an executable that uses `racket/place'. What's

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #27163: master branch updated

2013-07-18 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:45:47 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: With this change, does `raco exe' still work? I think `lazy-require' expands in a way that would require the `racket/place/distributed' module to be

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #27163: master branch updated

2013-07-18 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: At Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:45:47 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: With this change, does `raco exe' still work? I think `lazy-require' expands in a

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #27158: master branch updated

2013-07-18 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:46 PM, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote: d50d0f8 Matthew Flatt mfl...@racket-lang.org 2013-07-16 15:56 : | enable compilation of tests formerly in racket-test; reorganize | | A package like gui does not depend on a package like gui-test, | which means that you have

Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:44:41 -0600, Neil Toronto wrote: I maintain 3 collections that will become ring-0 packages. What should I (and others like me) be doing right now in response to the Big Package Shift? For packages that are currently in the main Racket repo, then there's nothing in

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #27158: master branch updated

2013-07-18 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:33:31 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:46 PM, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote: d50d0f8 Matthew Flatt mfl...@racket-lang.org 2013-07-16 15:56 : | enable compilation of tests formerly in racket-test; reorganize | | A package like gui

Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:52:21 -0600, Matthew Flatt mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said: Matthew At Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:17:08 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: Maybe I have missed it but is there, or will there be a documentation showing the dependency of packages. Like

Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: 1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir parameter given at as an arg [...] 2. collects path should be allowed for another location ie. [...] I'll work on those. Finally currently build system can't complete the install

Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread James McCoy
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:07:38PM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: 1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir parameter given at as an arg [...] 2. collects path should be allowed for another location ie. [...] I'll work on

Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:51:08 -0400, James McCoy jamessan-8fiuurrzop0dnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org said: James On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:07:38PM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: 1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir

Re: [racket-dev] package-system update

2013-07-18 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:07:38 -0600, Matthew Flatt mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said: Matthew At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: 1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir parameter given at as an arg [...] 2. collects path