[racket-dev] provide expand-clause in racket/private/for.rkt

Hi dev, I would like to provide (for-syntax) the "expand-clause" function in racket/private/for.rkt. Would this cause any problems? Would anyone object to this? I have an implementation of for/X in my generic-bind library that uses expand-clause and with it, the generic-bind ~for forms are as fas

Re: [racket-dev] tests not being run?

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:55 PM, David Vanderson wrote: > I totally missed pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-test/tests/run-automated-tests.rkt, > but it looks like DrDr is running that with 'mzc -k _' - doesn't that just > compile it? > Yes, the intention there is to run the tests individually but test th