My wife and I will be in Boston a day early (Friday). Does anyone
have a must-see touristy suggestion for us?
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
RacketCon 2013
--
We are pleased to announce that (third RacketCon) will take place on
September
Things I really enjoy in Boston:
- The Museum of Fine Arts, right across the street from Northeastern
- The Freedom Trail, a self-guided walking tour of many historic Boston sights
This goes through the North End, which is a nice place to walk
around all on its own.
- The Boston Harbor Islands
+1 to all of Sam's suggestions.
I'd also add the waterfront as being a nice area (relatively new to
Boston). If you head to the water from Quincy Market, there's the
Aquarium. Then you can turn right and walk along the water through
Rowes Wharf and to the old rotating bridge that's pedestrian
p.s. The walk I described is mostly parallel to the Rose Kennedy
Greenway that Sam mentioned, just a block apart, so you could head out
one way and back the other.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Greg Hendershott
greghendersh...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to all of Sam's suggestions.
I'd also add
Sorry if I am rising a false alarm. I noticed that there is a massive
download of my package
called bystroTeX :
http://planet.racket-lang.org/display.ss?package=bystroTeX.pltowner=amkhlv
All the downloads are of the (old) version 1.6
What is going on?
Is it possible to figure out who downloads
I don't think that the planet server itself doesn't keep enough information
to say much about this, but the requests come via apache so there might be
more information in a log file at that level that Eli might be able to tell
us about.
I do see lots of requests coming in for packages, tho. In
I just looked into that, and it seems that there's something bad going
on with some machine at BYU which started yesterday. (Ping: Jay.)
The offending traffic comes from fltr5.byu.edu, at a very high rate.
The new log file for the week had started at 2013-09-22 03:40 local
time (about 12.5 hours
Update: bringing it down for a few minutes didn't help, and the
offending process continues its merciless traffic. I've added a
temporary rule that effectively blacklists planet access from that IP
address. (Apologies in case that's a shared machine.) All I see now,
are failed attempts to get
(Note that instead of the apache rule I now switched to a firewall
rule, so it won't even get 403 responses now.)
40 minutes ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Update: bringing it down for a few minutes didn't help, and the
offending process continues its merciless traffic. I've added a
temporary rule
Next time, feel free to follow the directions on
internal.racket-lang.org. Now that you've turn off its access, rather
than just logging in and killing it, I can't test and see what the
underlying problem was. Let me know when you have turn traffic back
on.
Jay
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:26 PM,
It is like he is trying to justify his existence while he is on his way out
the door which seems strange. IIUC, we cannot afford $80/90k or whatever it
was he costs anyway.
So I have no idea what to think about his message.
Robby
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Jay McCarthy
50 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
Next time, feel free to follow the directions on
internal.racket-lang.org.
I have no practical way to know whether it's actually one of your
machines. (I did check that it's not an IP that is in our DNS.)
Now that you've turn off its access, rather than
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
50 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
Next time, feel free to follow the directions on
internal.racket-lang.org.
I have no practical way to know whether it's actually one of your
machines. (I did check that it's not an IP
A few minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
In retrospect, I guess it's not so obvious that the package server
contacts the old server regularly to build the compatibility version
packages.
Is this the package server?? The IP I have for that is
128.187.105.226, which is different from the IP
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
In retrospect, I guess it's not so obvious that the package server
contacts the old server regularly to build the compatibility version
packages.
Is this the package server?? The
Just now, Jay McCarthy wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
In any case, if it is the package server through some other
machine, then it's best to change it so it comes from the actual
server.
I don't know what's going on with that. It's in a
One last self-reply for future readers who may judge Eli more by this one
interaction than his body of work, let me also add that Eli has been a huge
part of whatever success we've had with Racket. He positive influence
cannot be overstated.
Sorry again for being a jerk, Eli.
Robby
On Sun,
17 matches
Mail list logo
