Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.0, corrected url

2013-12-30 Thread Robby Findler
My initial reaction to your message is that this is far too big of a test case to hand over to someone else. Is there some way we can get you access to a machine that demonstrates the problem so you can make something smaller? Robby On Monday, December 30, 2013, Neil Toronto wrote: I don't

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.0, Second Call

2013-12-30 Thread David Van Horn
On 12/29/13, 1:57 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: * David Van Horn dvanh...@ccs.neu.edu - EoPL Tests Done. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.0, Second Call

2013-12-30 Thread Neil Toronto
We really shouldn't ship until this memory leak is fixed (which I just reported): http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=viewpr=14264 It's making writing substantial programs very difficult, especially in Typed Racket, which seems to be affected more. It's possible there's a weird

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.0, Second Call

2013-12-30 Thread Robby Findler
I assume you checked and it doesn't happen in 5.3.6? Robby On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.comwrote: We really shouldn't ship until this memory leak is fixed (which I just reported): http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=viewpr=14264 It's making

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.0, Second Call

2013-12-30 Thread Neil Toronto
No, but that was a good idea, so I checked it. It doesn't happen in 5.3.6. Neil ⊥ On 12/30/2013 09:14 PM, Robby Findler wrote: I assume you checked and it doesn't happen in 5.3.6? Robby On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com mailto:neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote: