If I'm one of the few using it, I have no objections to it going away. I
need an excuse to migrate anyway.
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> Robby Findler wrote at 04/14/2014 01:27 PM:
>
>> I think that the problem Neil is having with it is the ridiculous
>> amount of spam that
I think the release branch has been created already -- assuming that's
right, then you can/should remove it now.
Robby
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2014-04-14 15:42:18 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
>> Lets have a full cycles without it in the git tree before the rele
On 2014-04-14 15:42:18 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> Lets have a full cycles without it in the git tree before the release,
> but otherwise, I think so yes.
Okay, then I'll remove it after v6.0.1 is released.
Cheers,
Asumu
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-
Lets have a full cycles without it in the git tree before the release,
but otherwise, I think so yes.
Robby
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few releases ago we announced our intention to remove the
> mzlib/class100 library from Racket. I think this was sche
Robby Findler wrote at 04/14/2014 01:27 PM:
I think that the problem Neil is having with it is the ridiculous
amount of spam that gets trapped inside it.
(But correct me if I'm wrong, Neil!)
I also have other objections to it. But if Doug is still using it, I
guess leaving it running makes
Hi all,
A few releases ago we announced our intention to remove the
mzlib/class100 library from Racket. I think this was scheduled to happen
around either last release or this upcoming release.
Should I go ahead and remove mzlib/class100 and its docs? Its uses in
the codebase should be long gone
I think that the problem Neil is having with it is the ridiculous
amount of spam that gets trapped inside it.
(But correct me if I'm wrong, Neil!)
So maybe we can work around the problem another way if others find it
still has value.
Robby
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Doug Williams
wrote
I use it and have not migrated to Github. But, it is no biggie for me one
way or the other.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Does anyone else find it has value?
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Sunday, April 13, 2014, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
>> Can the PLaneT bug-tracking system be shut
8 matches
Mail list logo