I realize this is a very old thread, but the behavior of Racket has not
changed since.
On 03-05-14 23:29, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
On 07/10/2012 05:03 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:51:57 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
20 minutes ago, Marijn wrote:
It seems to me that both
The difference between
(define-for-syntax (fx x) #`(let ((x 0)) #,x))
^---*
and
(define-for-syntax (fy y) #`(let ((x 0)) #,y))
*
is that the `x` of `(let ((x ...)))` gets lexical context from the `x`
argument to `fx`, but
For anyone interested in high performance JIT compilers, Filip Pizlo's
post here: https://www.webkit.org/blog/3362/introducing-the-webkit-ftl-jit/
about the new JIT they've added in WebKit using LLVM will be very
interesting.
Sam
_
Racket Developers list:
3 matches
Mail list logo
