Enclosed.
This approach can be as general as it is ugly, but I think `table`
should more directly support lines between rows and columns.
At Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:58:16 -0400, Kathi Fisler wrote:
> Great, thanks! How do I augment this with horizontal lines (\hlines) at
> the top and bottom, as wel
FWIW, I think this is what the style guide would recommend. I found
the transformation to be pretty straightforward, except that I had to
rename on occurrence of 'H' to 'H2'. (I didn't try to test it, tho!)
Robby
(define (make-natural->rearrangement L (EQ? equal?))
(define N (nr-of-rearrangemen
Hi Robby
Replacing if by cond is very stylisch indeed. Nowadays I use cond more than
if, especially if it is nested or if I need internal definitions in one or
more of the alternatives. Replacing the outer named let by a reference to a
function defined outside of the procedure is not too difficult,
I think that the prefer-define-over-let applies only to the first let
in this program.
The style guide also would recommend 'cond' over 'if' here, but it
becomes very very important to do that only if there were nested
'let's or 'begin's or the like and you don't have that.
Robby
On Mon, Jun 23,
Great, thanks! How do I augment this with horizontal lines (\hlines) at
the top and bottom, as well as between each pair of consecutive lines?
Assume this is a style of some sort (I should be all set after that).
Kathi
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 23 Jun 20
In the recommendations of http://docs.racket-lang.org/style/index.html it is
recommended to use (internal or module top-level) define rather than named
let.
I use named let a lot. How would you rewrite the following? For me it is
rather difficult to make the change without loosing track of the scop
On Jun 23, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Kevin Forchione wrote:
> I’ve only skimmed the manual so far, but see it doesn’t address one of my
> questions: whether and when to favor functions such as first/rest/empty?,
> etc., over the Lisp-y car/cdr/null?, etc. I have noticed that some of these
> function
On Jun 22, 2014, at 10:35 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2014-06-22 20:27:21 -0700, Kevin Forchione wrote:
>> Thanks! Is there any documentation or guide on which *styles* to prefer in
>> writing Racket code? I find myself scratching my head at times in these
>> matters!
>
> In recent Rac
At Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:45:44 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
> >
> > 6a5a303 Matthew Flatt 2014-06-23 13:23:47 +0100
> > :
> > | avoid getting stuck on non-UTF-8 symbol encodings in bytecode
> > |
>
>
> Does this fix apply to keywords as well?
Yes.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
>
> 6a5a303 Matthew Flatt 2014-06-23 13:23:47 +0100
> :
> | avoid getting stuck on non-UTF-8 symbol encodings in bytecode
> |
Does this fix apply to keywords as well?
I assume that strings are handled differently.
Sam
_
Racket
At Mon, 23 Jun 2014 03:59:38 -0400, Kathi Fisler wrote:
> I need to create a table/tabular in which each column has a different fixed
> width. In latex, I would write {p{1in} | p{2in}} in the column
> specification.
>
> Anyone have a sample of scribble code that does this?
The enclosed example wo
I need to create a table/tabular in which each column has a different fixed
width. In latex, I would write {p{1in} | p{2in}} in the column
specification.
Anyone have a sample of scribble code that does this?
thanks,
Kathi
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-l
12 matches
Mail list logo
