The release process for v6.1 has begun: the `release' branch was
created for any work that is left and is now bumped to v6.0.900.900. You
can go on using the `master' branch as usual, it is now bumped to
v6.1.0.1 (to avoid having two different trees with the same version).
If you have any bug-fix
At Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:49:49 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > At Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:15:10 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >> - I think we need to support planet packages -- there are some people
> >> still releasing new ones, and the
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:15:10 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> - I wonder if using Docker instead of VirtualBox could make
>> incrementality easier, since that's one of things that they focus on.
>
> I don't think it would be easier, but i
At Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:15:10 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> - I wonder if using Docker instead of VirtualBox could make
> incrementality easier, since that's one of things that they focus on.
I don't think it would be easier, but it might be more efficient and
even easier to set up, so it see
At Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:08:34 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > At Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:08:27 +0200, Jan Dvořák wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 12:46 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> >> > The rightmost column of the table may need some explana
This is lovely.
A few thoughts:
- I wonder if using Docker instead of VirtualBox could make
incrementality easier, since that's one of things that they focus on.
- I wanted to be able to see which of my packages had problems, so I
wrote this PR: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/721 but I'm not
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 13:14 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> A package "X" that provides a collection "X" of the same name should
> probably also call its documentation "X".
Thanks, I've fixed mine.
Looking forward to having pkg-docs at a single place. :-)
_
Racket Develope
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:08:27 +0200, Jan Dvořák wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 12:46 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> > The rightmost column of the table may need some explanation. The column
>> > highlights conflicts among names of package-inst
At Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:08:27 +0200, Jan Dvořák wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 12:46 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > The rightmost column of the table may need some explanation. The column
> > highlights conflicts among names of package-installed executables,
> > foreign libraries, and documents. Cu
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 12:46 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> The rightmost column of the table may need some explanation. The column
> highlights conflicts among names of package-installed executables,
> foreign libraries, and documents. Currently, all the conflicts are
> document names, because sever
I've been working on a service that builds all packages listed at
"pkgs.racket-lang.org". The idea is to run builds regularly (at least
once a day) and link to documentation and build-status information from
"pkgs.racket-lang.org".
Here's a table showing the current results for each package:
ht
11 matches
Mail list logo
