On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
2. Could you point me to a criteria that classify Racket as a 'fringe'
language
and Clojure as a non-fringe language?
This is no criterion, but it is suggestive:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
So, if I'm reading this correctly, we've gone from ~590K lines of C to about
~340K lines of C. That's amazing.
Something is wrong. In your listing, the only two lines that have changed are
these:
8404 22017
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
In the case I have, though, I want the sequence to be empty. The
problem is that these bodies -- (let () ...), (parameterize () ...),
etc. -- are used for a lot of different things. A macro may splice in
a sequence that
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
If I get a vote, +1/2 from me.
My vote isn't +1 because I'd rather see a syntactic restriction removed:
make the inside of a `begin' an internal definition context. Then the change
would happen in every similar macro
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
In my defense, I was talking about framerate, not total or average cost of
memory management.
That is very different situation.
Games are really almost real-time apps.
I'd say that they *are* real-time apps. You
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi s...@cs.brown.edu
wrote:
My experience teaching Scheme beginners is that Lisp-style prefix for
arithmetic is NOT a problem; they get the hang of it quickly. It's
when things start to nest and parens start to add on that they start
to
6 matches
Mail list logo
