of patience so I'm posting this and taking off to school.
Thanks for the help!
-Everett
At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:55:00 -0600, Everett Morse wrote:
I decided to try compiling Racket on my home desktop again. With futures
disabled I get a different error. I am on a 32-bit mac, so maybe things
application looks.
Thanks,
-Everett Morse
p.s. Implementation of alt-exp available at
http://www.neptic.com/np/software/alt-exp.php
-Original Message-
From: dev-boun...@racket-lang.org
[mailto:dev-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Everett
Sent: 26 August 2010 20:10
To: plt-dev
Would this mean equal?, eq?, =, or what? I suppose it would make
sense to be =? since the others have a question mark, but I'd almost
prefer it to be equal? just to save me some typing. (In fact, maybe
I'll bind it to that myself ...). I imagine that this kind of confusion
is, or is related
I was just trying to debug a program today that goes through a series of
complex macros. I used Check Syntax so I can see what variables are
bound where (some of which are syntax variables), and when I got stuck I
wanted to see how the macro reduces. I clicked the macro stepper, and
it spun
Is there something wrong with my build? This happens when I remove everything
from my build directory AND with a fresh repository (so it's not something
weird I did). I tried a pull on Fri, Sat, and today (Mon), and get this error
still. (Using the command git clone
Comments on the below discussion and possible implementation ideas.
User-contributed comments should be annotations to the documentation. They
could then be fetched using JS (Ajax) from the local copy when an internet
connection is available, and if there is no internet connection the
What is this error:
gcc -m32 -I./.. -I../../../racket/src/../include -arch i386 -Wall -DOS_X
-D_DARWIN_UNLIMITED_SELECT -pthread -fno-common -c
../../../racket/src/future.c -o future.o
../../../racket/src/future.c: In function ‘scheme_future_block_until_gc’:
I had some thoughts about Racket's documentation compared to PHP's last
night, so this morning I wrote up a blog post about it.
Here is the link:
http://www.neptic.com/blog/2010/09/how-to-design-documentation/
Below, for your convenience, is the complete text copy-pasted in.
Thanks,
-Everett
On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
Responding to Everett's suggestion:
I don't understand why not write a lexer, since replacing do: () with
{} is the most natural and readable thing to do.
I really don't want to touch the lexer level.
Until this morning, I
On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Michael Sperber
sper...@deinprogramm.de wrote:
Well, except for a bunch of renamings (... in the direction of
... Common Lisp ...?), that doesn't really show yet.
I'm not going to repeat what I've
10 matches
Mail list logo
