[racket-dev] Can someone tell whats wrong with this?

2011-02-25 Thread Hari Prashanth
The program is killed when the call to `collect' inside for loop is commented... I am using a fairly recent version of Racket... #lang racket/load (module RACKETSET racket/base (require (prefix-in rk: racket/set)) (define list1 (build-list 100 add1)) (define list2 (build-list

Re: [racket-dev] F1 on latest release

2010-10-20 Thread Hari Prashanth
I have seen this before... If I remember correctly, it happened after using raco fileinject and raco remove several times... I just removed .racket directory and it went away... I could not reproduce the problem, so I did not report it... Hari - Original Message - From: Matthias

[racket-dev] Bug? identifier `make-Int' not included in nested require spec.

2010-10-04 Thread Hari Prashanth
Am I doing some thing wrong or is it a bug? #lang racket/load (module UNTYPED racket/base (struct Int (elem)) (provide (struct-out Int))) (module TYPED typed/racket (require/typed 'UNTYPED [struct Int ([elem : Integer])])) I get the following error only-in:

Re: [racket-dev] Bug? identifier `make-Int' not included in nested require spec.

2010-10-04 Thread Hari Prashanth
Ok it does work... Thanks Hari - Original Message - From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu To: Hari Prashanth krh...@ccs.neu.edu Cc: dev dev@racket-lang.org Sent: Monday, October 4, 2010 7:16:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Bug? identifier `make-Int

[racket-dev] Problem with GC or with my machine?

2010-09-02 Thread Hari Prashanth
I am getting the following error... And this is the only message I get... SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0xfffc This often means 0xfffc isn't getting marked, and was prematurely freed Aborted What does it mean? Has anyone seen this? If you want to take a look at

Re: [racket-dev] P4P: A Syntax Proposal

2010-07-28 Thread Hari Prashanth
I have heard students saying that they did not like Scheme syntax/parans even after using it for a whole semester. I really, to this day, haven't understood why they did not like parans. But given an option some people might start liking it/using it. I feel it would be a great idea to have P4P