Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #28225: master branch updated

2014-02-23 Thread James Swaine
Thanks Matthew! On Feb 23, 2014 5:01 PM, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote: mflatt has updated `master' from e0a1a40fd4 to 22617b7800. http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/e0a1a40fd4..22617b7800 =[ One Commit ]= Directory summary: 42.2%

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #25762: master branch updated

2012-11-26 Thread James Swaine
Is anyone else seeing strange behavior in DrRacket since this latest round of DrRacket-related commits? Here's what I'm seeing: -With definitions/interactions side by side, sometimes the vertical scroll bar in the interactions window disappears for no reason. -Saving a file can sometimes render

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #25762: master branch updated

2012-11-26 Thread James Swaine
is definitely helping me hone in on another one (the one you saw while looking at an error in drracket). (The commit below actually fixes one bug.) Robby On Monday, November 26, 2012, James Swaine wrote: Is anyone else seeing strange behavior in DrRacket since this latest round

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v5.3

2012-07-26 Thread James Swaine
james: - added would-be-future (a5676e9a) Would-be-future is a special type of future that always executes sequentially and records all potential barricades a regular future would encounter. - added futures visualizer (b6f71ec4) The futures visualizer is a graphical profiling tool

Re: [racket-dev] Where does this program allocate?

2012-07-24 Thread James Swaine
I noticed the large amount of allocation going on when I was using mandelbrot to test my fixes to the visualizer last week -- I'll take a look. I wrote an allocation hotspot profiler tool that may end up as part of the visualizer in some form, so I can try running it on your code. On Tue, Jul

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24958: master branch updated

2012-07-13 Thread James Swaine
I don't know if there's consensus here yet, but it seems like the best thing is to move racket/future/visualizer into a top-level: future-visualizer. Then racket/future/trace will become future-visualizer/trace. If that sounds reasonable, I'll go ahead and move them. On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24958: master branch updated

2012-07-10 Thread James Swaine
/ 43.6% collects/scribblings/guide/ 6.5% collects/scribblings/**reference/ 11.1% collects/tests/future/ ~~ b6f71ec James Swaine jamesswa...@racket-lang.org 2012-02-29 11:43 : | Add futures visualizer, improvements to futures logging : A collects/racket/future/**private

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24958: master branch updated

2012-07-10 Thread James Swaine
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: 10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: It is the future visualizer so I thought it belonged with the visualizer. No? (You mean ...

Re: [racket-dev] request for triangle in slideshow/pict

2012-03-22 Thread James Swaine
+1 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: very useful On Mar 22, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Stephen Chang wrote: Would anyone find it useful to have a triangle primitive in slideshow/pict? How easy would it be to add one? _  Racket

Re: [racket-dev] release blurb for 5.1.1 (Eli Barzilay)

2011-04-29 Thread James Swaine
Here's the release note for futures: - futures: added fsemaphores; 'future' primitive now no longer freezes futures; improved the logging messages futures produce -James On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:05 PM, dev-requ...@racket-lang.org wrote: Send dev mailing list submissions to

Re: [racket-dev] release blurb for 5.1.1 (Eli Barzilay)

2011-04-29 Thread James Swaine
That sounds fine to me. -James On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: 40 minutes ago, James Swaine wrote: Here's the release note for futures: - futures: added fsemaphores; 'future' primitive now no longer freezes futures; improved the logging

[racket-dev] Module Mismatch?

2011-02-14 Thread James Swaine
I'm getting a module mismatch error after pulling from git that I can't seem to make go away despite my best efforts. Here's the message: Starting program: /Users/jamesswaine/plt-cur-build/racket/racket3m ~/plt/collects/tests/future/future.rkt link: module mismatch, probably from old bytecode

Re: [racket-dev] Module Mismatch?

2011-02-14 Thread James Swaine
and seeing if you still see the error (without rebuilding them). Something like this: find ~/plt -type f -name \*.zo -exec rm {} \; Robby On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:44 PM, James Swaine james.swa...@gmail.com wrote: plt-cur-build isn't a source tree, it's just my build directory. On Mon, Feb

Re: [racket-dev] Module Mismatch?

2011-02-14 Thread James Swaine
you get from the script after you deleted the zos and before you rebuilt them? On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:58 PM, James Swaine james.swa...@gmail.com wrote: This didn't seem to fix it. After running this I tried again to make all the collects from scratch, but I still get the same error

Re: [racket-dev] Compile Error (Everett Morse)

2010-09-27 Thread James Swaine
Do you know, by chance, if your processor supports the SSE2 extensions? It looks like you're compiling on a 32-bit Mac... (In the meantime, if you don't need to use parallel futures, you can work around this by disabling futures in the build. Rerun the configure script and pass