Re: [racket-dev] Sandbox evaluation problem - files with comment boxes

2015-01-27 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
I would have tried; unfortunately, that runs into a second bug in v6.1.1 that I recently fixed. If you need a workaround other than using the next snapshot, I can look harder for one. Thanks for the report! At Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:27:31 -0500, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote: Ah, I am still

[racket-dev] Fwd: Sandbox evaluation problem - files with comment boxes

2015-01-26 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
??? --- nadeem -- Forwarded message -- From: Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.org Date: Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:35 PM Subject: Sandbox evaluation problem - files with comment boxes To: users us...@racket-lang.org I'm trying to create a simple sandbox evaluator (to load in programs

Re: [racket-dev] Create executable problem

2014-04-04 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
tracking possibly). Do you have the game to share? That would help a lot with the investigation. Robby On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.orgjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','nad...@acm.org'); wrote: I have a student trying to create a standalone executable

Re: [racket-dev] Parens/string quotes automatic behavior

2013-05-23 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Hello Racket devs, I'm working on tweaking how typing a double quote is handled in strings when DrRacket's auto parens mode is on, per recent post on the users list. If any of you use the mode and can offer feedback on the following, it'd be appreciated: In addition to handling Laurent's initial

[racket-dev] DrRacket automatic parentheses mode update

2012-12-03 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Some improvements to DrRacket's automatic parentheses mode are now available in the nightly build version and git repository. If you have previous tried auto-parens and abandoned it, or if you have never tried it, please do try it now! In auto-parens mode, typing a closing parenthesis will skip

Re: [racket-dev] Survey for DrRacket users related to automatic parentheses behavior

2012-11-24 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Laurent laurent.ors...@gmail.com wrote: If you can, I think it would be a good idea to remove the paren pair if the user deletes the opening paren he just typed by mistake. Undo should do the same (which apparently it does not currently; missing

Re: [racket-dev] Survey for DrRacket users related to automatic parentheses behavior

2012-11-24 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
interaction) and I don't think I'm going to go for this right now. On Saturday, November 24, 2012, Robby Findler wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Laurent laurent.ors...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 24

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] Survey for DrRacket users related to automatic parentheses behavior

2012-11-24 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Nick Shelley nickmshel...@gmail.comwrote: I sort of like this behavior, and the visual difference gets rid of any potential confusion. Just an idea... you might duplicate Paredit's

[racket-dev] provide specs in eopl in repository use (all-defined-out) instead of (all-defined)

2012-04-02 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
How come when building Racket from the latest source of the repository (at least as of 3 days ago), #lang eopl doesn't recognize (all-defined) as a valid provide spec and wants (all-defined-out) instead? --- nadeem _ Racket Developers list:

Re: [racket-dev] provide specs in eopl in repository use (all-defined-out) instead of (all-defined)

2012-04-02 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
or similar? Would a #lang eopl/mzscheme or something like that be useful for backwards compatibility? (You'd still need to use that #lang line, tho, since the regular eopl language is now changed for good.) Robby On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.org wrote: How

Re: [racket-dev] plea for short planet syntax in student languages?

2011-11-13 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Thank you very much for this! The documentation for *SL needs updating to reflect support for the short planet syntax, e.g. http://docs.racket-lang.org/htdp-langs/beginner.html?q=require#(form._((lib._lang/htdp-beginner..rkt)._require)) --- nadeem On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Robby

Re: [racket-dev] plea for short planet syntax in student languages?

2011-10-05 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Yes, please! --- nadeem On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:20 PM, John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote: I'm using the rsound planet package in beginning student languages, and requiring them to type (require (planet main.rkt (clements rsound.plt 2 6))) at the top of every file is a bit

Re: [racket-dev] See, that's what I'm talking about

2011-09-09 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
If you will kindly fax your account information on a company letterhead I will contact my lawyer to initiate transfer of the requisite funds forthwithly. On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.eduwrote: Now when do we get our check for $179 (or whatever it was).

Re: [racket-dev] planet bug reporting interface

2011-09-06 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
By the way, something happened recently (in the past week or two) to the tickets on planet. I had opened two tickets in early August to remind myself of things to fix, but a few days ago when I looked, there were no open tickets listed anymore for the package

Re: [racket-dev] planet bug reporting interface

2011-09-06 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
sorry. Please do re-file them. Robby On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.org wrote: By the way, something happened recently (in the past week or two) to the tickets on planet. I had opened two tickets in early August to remind myself of things to fix, but a few days ago

Re: [racket-dev] New error messages for *SL

2011-07-11 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Yes, they're useful for 'teachpacks' like the Kiva teachpack... (https://github.com/nadeemabdulhamid/Kiva-Teachpack) On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi s...@cs.brown.edu wrote: Whoa, whoa there.  They're there for a reason.  I can't remember why, but I am pretty certain I

Re: [racket-dev] overwrite

2011-02-26 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
-- Nadeem Abdul Hamid Associate Professor, Computer Science Berry College PO Box 5014 2277 Martha Berry Hwy NW Mount Berry, GA 30149-5014 (706) 368-5632 http://cs.berry.edu/~nhamid/ _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org

[racket-dev] Something wrong with check-within

2010-11-11 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
The check-within in the follow program (in BSL/ISL) seems to hang. This is sort of the simplest example I can reproduce, but my students have been running into this with some more complicated test cases. I thought it might have to do with the inexact numbers, but even if you change the #i0.501 to

Re: [racket-dev] Simple loop checking in beginner?

2010-11-10 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
HtDP in Coq? Hadn't thought of of that before... On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: A factor of 2.+. (We could provide a type system, take away recursion, and replace it with a structural induction form. It would be impossible to write infinite

[racket-dev] define-struct exports something to BSL

2010-09-21 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Consider a beginner file with: (define-struct boa (name length)) Student writes a template/function with parameter named a-boa, but misspells one occurrence, writing boa instead of a-boa. (define (feed a-boa) (make-boa (boa-name a-boa) (boa-length boa))) Their tests then fail

[racket-dev] Universe double buffering

2010-09-02 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Why doesn't 2htdp/universe use double-buffering? --- nadeem _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Universe double buffering

2010-09-02 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
again? (If the double buffering appears to come back I think I know what happened.) Robby On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.org wrote: Why do you think it doesn't? (I'm assuming you mean: What makes me think that it is not double-buffering?) ... I have a list

[racket-dev] What happened to image=? in 2htdp/image

2010-08-29 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Is the idea to use equal? to compare images? Wouldn't it be better to define image=? just for the sake of uniformity? --- nadeem _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [racket-dev] self-documenting feature

2010-07-19 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Do ask the person who asked whether Python has coverage now. -- Matthias Maybe not packaged for beginners, but it is doable... http://pypi.python.org/pypi/coverage/2.85 http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage/ _ For list-related

Re: [racket-dev] self-documenting feature

2010-07-19 Thread Nadeem Abdul Hamid
Yes, but Racket docstrings aren't even there at all (yet :))... On Jul 19, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: That's the question. Packaged for beginners; always there, never to ask for. On Jul 19, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote: Do ask the person who asked