I don't think we should add functions to TR that are not in Racket and
that are not clearly type-related (e.g., `cast`).
I also like Jens's solution better. Education vs crutches.
Vincent
At Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:39:16 -0500,
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
I'd add them to Typed Racket. That's
FWIW, pulling from git.racket-lang.org has been slow (i.e. ~30mins) for
some of us in the last couple of days. Something in the mirroring may be
timing out for similar reasons.
Vincent
At Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:41:56 -0300,
Gustavo Massaccesi wrote:
* openssl: recognize version 1.0.1j #8265c9
I just pushed something, and now the Github mirror is up to date. The
push must have kicked the mirroring mechanism.
Vincent
At Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:54:10 -0500,
Vincent St-Amour wrote:
FWIW, pulling from git.racket-lang.org has been slow (i.e. ~30mins) for
some of us in the last couple
In case anyone would like to use a non-gmail address for sign up, you
can sign up from this URL:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/racket-dev/join
The regular sign up button wouldn't let me.
Vincent
At Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:47:58 -0800,
John Clements wrote:
Dear developers,
PLT
That sounds good to me.
One concern, though: it looks like recreating old releases requires that
all the participating repos (1) still exist, (2) have the same
name/location, and (3) still have the release tags. I'm not too worried
about (1) and (3), but I could see (2) happening if, e.g., a
For TR:
* Exception handling changed to be safe. This may break existing
programs that rely on unsafe behavior.
* Exports from the GUI and framework libraries have types, and can be
used transparently from typed programs.
* Casts and predicates are supported in typed regions.
Vincent
/tests/typed-racket/unit-tests/
~~
9030680 Vincent St-Amour stamo...@racket-lang.org 2014-10-20 11:34
:
| Fix types for foldl and foldr with 3 lists.
|
| Thanks to Jack Firth for the report.
:
M .../tests/typed-racket/unit-tests/typecheck-tests.rkt| 13
At Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:13:54 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
- Match Tests
- Typed Racket Tests
Done.
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.1.1 as the most current version; email
At Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:22:04 -0400,
Vincent St-Amour wrote:
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.1.1 as the most current version; email me
to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such
changes.)
In process.
Pushed as commit
are a close match for the test content and crash reports.
The bug was introduced in 2009 (commit bc47db42e4).
At Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:00:25 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
The file listed below has been segfaulting intermittently for about a
month, but I can't reproduce the crash on any of my
The file listed below has been segfaulting intermittently for about a
month, but I can't reproduce the crash on any of my machines (Linux or
Mac OS, both 64 bits).
Walking backwards through the commit log from the first occurrence of
the crash on DrDr, the first commit that looks like it may be
At Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:55:59 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
I didn't change the main-distribution package. I changed the Utah
snapshot's configuration to make the Racket distribution have
main-distribution plus optimization-coach.
Ah, I see. Got it.
Changing main-distribution would interfere
Great, thanks!
I didn't see changes to the main repo to reflect that addition. Are the
contents of the main distribution not part of the repo anymore?
Vincent
At Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:46:02 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
The Racket snapshots at
http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/
now
Ok, let's try to do that. Is there currently a way to include packages
from 3rd party repos to the main distribution?
Vincent
At Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:03:04 -0400,
Greg Hendershott wrote:
Being in the main repo is different from being in the distribution (and
thus automatically installed).
At Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:03:12 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
- Match Tests
- Typed Racket Tests
Done.
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.1 as the most current version; email
At Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:24:24 -0400,
Asumu Takikawa wrote:
On 2014-07-21 16:14:27 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Sam, Asumu, Eric: what's new for this release?
This came up on IRC the other day. I think Eric was saying the main
changes were inference speedups, support for contracted
At Thu, 01 May 2014 13:49:55 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
vincent:
- contract profiler (cc0e6763, 7495243d, etc)
Nothing significant for this release.
- make f[lx]vectors sequences (8e32e6e4)
Not sure that's worth putting in the release notes, but if we decide it
is, here's a bullet:
-
Extra bit of information, this works too:
#lang racket
(define ns (make-empty-namespace))
(namespace-attach-module (current-namespace) ''#%builtin ns)
(parameterize ([current-namespace ns])
(namespace-require m.rkt))
But replacing ''#%builtin with ''#%kernel or ''#%boot
/
47.0%
pkgs/typed-racket-pkgs/typed-racket-test/tests/typed-racket/optimizer/tests/
~~
ce3033a Vincent St-Amour stamo...@racket-lang.org 2014-04-25 13:40
:
| Keep dead case-lambda clauses around to avoid changing arity.
|
| Closes PR14468.
:
A
pkgs/typed-racket-pkgs
At Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:41:49 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:36:40 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:19:25 -0400,
mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
a01b12e Matthew Flatt mfl...@racket-lang.org 2014-04-19 10:11
:
| optimizer: don't move expressions
At Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:19:25 -0400,
mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
a01b12e Matthew Flatt mfl...@racket-lang.org 2014-04-19 10:11
:
| optimizer: don't move expressions into a `with-continuation-mark`
|
| ... unless the optimizer can prove that the expression doesn't
| inspect continuation
I looked through the package descriptions, and it doesn't look like any
of them would use the profiler.
I'll do the change.
Vincent
At Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:33:48 -0400,
Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Will do.
Is there a convenient way to grep through packages without installing them?
Vincent
Right. I'll fix the TR random tester.
Vincent
At Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:25:42 -0400,
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Just to confirm: Redex isn't doing anything wrong, right?
Correct -- I think `real` was always
At Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:31:29 -0500,
mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
+@history[#:added 6.0.0.1]
IIUC, x.y.z.w versions are not usually user-visible (at least, they
don't correspond to any released version). Do we want to expose them in
the docs?
Vincent
_
Racket
These release notes look good to me, but maybe a bit short.
Since this is our first release with new features since 5.3.4 last May,
I would have expected a longer list. For example, during the previous
release notes discussion, Jay and Neil had some bullets that I don't see
on this list. There
At Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:25:06 -0600,
Robby Findler wrote:
[1 text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)]
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Vincent St-Amour
stamo...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
These release notes look good to me, but maybe a bit short.
Since this is our first release with new features since
At Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:38:32 -0500,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
- Match Tests
- Typed Racket Tests
Done.
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.0 as the most current version; email
At Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:29:25 -0500,
Vincent St-Amour wrote:
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.0 as the most current version; email me
to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such
changes.)
Coming soon.
Pushed. It's commit
At Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:37:28 -0500,
Neil Toronto wrote:
For the following program, on my computer, the new random -
unsafe-flrandom optimization slows down the first loop and speeds up
the second:
#lang typed/racket
(require math/flonum
racket/unsafe/ops)
(define g
While looking at Asumu's `raco-find-collection' package, Asumu and I
noticed something about the `collection-path' function that made us
uncomfortable.
`collection-path' returns *a* path where the given collection is
located. With the package system, there can now be *multiple* such
paths.
At Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:49:44 -0600,
Robby Findler wrote:
collection-path is legacy and should generally be removed when you find it
(I think I fixed two uses of it Saturday in fact).
The documentation does mention that `collection-file-path' is usually
preferred, but it doesn't make it clear
I was thinking of the `Set' type constructor as meaning generic set,
which is why I gave that type to `generic-set?'. This interpretation is
a problem because TR treats sets as covariant.
If we make sets invariant, could TR support generic sets? [1] Or are
there other issues I'm missing?
Vincent
change.
I think there is a bunch of existing code that assumes that Set is
exactly hashsets, or at least covariant.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
I was thinking of the `Set' type constructor as meaning generic set,
which is why I gave
It looks like you may want `define-inline' from `racket/performance-hint'.
Vincent
At Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:11:51 -0400,
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
Ah, indeed. I'm calling `random` in the closure now. Fixing that
removes the anomaly.
Sam
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Matthew
unwind).
A related symptom I had noticed was that building without gcc
optimization used disabled stack traces; that's now fixed.
There are still ways to end up with an empty stack trace, but it should
happen much less often.
At Wed, 07 Aug 2013 17:49:57 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote
I had installed Stephen's `graph' package. Then, he pushed a new
version, and I tried updating my install. Here's the error I got:
stamourv@ahuntsic:plt$ raco pkg update graph
Inferred package scope: /home/stamourv/src/plt/racket/share/pkgs
Resolving graph via
At Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:59:57 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:23:33 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
I had installed Stephen's `graph' package. Then, he pushed a new
version, and I tried updating my install. Here's the error I got:
stamourv@ahuntsic:plt$ raco pkg
At Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:19:28 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:12:12 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:59:57 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:23:33 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
I had installed Stephen's `graph' package
I'm profiling one of the contract benchmarks[1], and I noticed that
sometimes (about 10 out of 300 samples), `continuation-mark-set-context'
would return an empty stack trace. This number is cut down by about half
if I disable the JIT. These samples seem to be spread out throughout
execution
At Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:33:02 -0400,
Carl Eastlund wrote:
[1 text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)]
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
With that in mind, I think it would make sense to move `set-first' and
`set-empty?' to the primitive set (making it clear that
At Thu, 1 Aug 2013 18:56:08 -0400,
Carl Eastlund wrote:
Ah, yes, set-stream isn't primitive because it can be derived if you have
set-first and either set-rest or set-remove. And I know there are
dependency cycles, this is intentional so that you can implement any one of
several related
?
Thanks,
Robby
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
The TR tests still fail when using a single place.
The following commits should be included in the release:
069ff59a4bd6a988a5670c7e4dd38c1dbbe12ec0
0e7940ab4943600e6f5c8f13ce7ee13e8af9a8f5
The TR tests still fail when using a single place.
The following commits should be included in the release:
069ff59a4bd6a988a5670c7e4dd38c1dbbe12ec0
0e7940ab4943600e6f5c8f13ce7ee13e8af9a8f5
ab5075bc762356f86bb7dfd34dac8d24ada1a140
Vincent
At Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:49:20 -0400,
Vincent St-Amour
On 64 bit Linux, `continuation-mark-set-context' doesn't provide any
stack trace anymore, instead always returning the empty list. It was
working at least up to 5.3.4.
When the JIT is disabled, I get the expected stack traces.
This regression breaks the profiler, the contract profiler, and the
At Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:29:27 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
Is this in 5.3.6 or in the git head version?
5.3.6 is fine. That was on git HEAD. Matthew's last commit fixed it.
Is this related to the test failures you reported earlier?
No.
Vincent
_
Racket Developers
are at
-- http://pre.racket-lang.org/release/installers
The Linux/i386/Ubuntu Precise installer is 64 bits, which is wrong.
* Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
- Match Tests
- Typed Racket Tests
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
Bash completion for raco setup (in
pkgs/plt-services/meta/contrib/completion/racket-completion.bash)
is currently broken. It only completes collects that are in the core.
I haven't tried it, but I suspect that zsh completion is similarly
broken.
To find collects to complete, the script looks for
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 18:39:57 -0400,
Carl Eastlund wrote:
Also if you're going to memoize things, why are you using assoc rather than
a hash table? Or if at all possible, a weak hash table?
I'm using `procedure-closure-contents-eq?' as the equality predicate.
AFAIK, there's no hash table for
/5ea3a1ce6d..6e8c9ed15a
=[ 2 Commits ]==
Directory summary:
82.9% collects/racket/contract/private/
17.0% collects/scribblings/reference/
~~
d1df869 Vincent St-Amour stamo...@racket-lang.org javascript:;
2013-06
Sam, Asumu and I found and fixed the bug. Here's the problem in a
nutshell.
This is the implementation of `delay/thread' from racket/promise.
(define (delay/thread thunk)
(let ()
(define (run)
(call-with-exception-handler
(lambda (e) (pset! p (make-reraise
At Fri, 3 May 2013 11:56:02 -0400,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
A few minutes ago, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Sam, Asumu and I found and fixed the bug. Here's the problem in a
nutshell.
This is the implementation of `delay/thread' from racket/promise.
(define (delay/thread thunk
construct.
At Fri, 03 May 2013 11:45:38 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Sam, Asumu and I found and fixed the bug. Here's the problem in a
nutshell.
This is the implementation of `delay/thread' from racket/promise.
(define (delay/thread thunk)
(let ()
(define (run
At Fri, 3 May 2013 12:17:46 -0400,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
A few minutes ago, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Fri, 3 May 2013 11:56:02 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
(define (delay/thread thunk)
(let ()
(define p (make-promise/thread #f))
(pset! p (make-running-thread
I tried your suggestion, and it doesn't fix the original bug.
I'll stick with the semaphores solution.
Vincent
At Fri, 03 May 2013 13:13:45 -0400,
Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Fri, 3 May 2013 12:17:46 -0400,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
A few minutes ago, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Fri, 3
At Wed, 1 May 2013 17:35:44 -0400,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
* The Optimization Coach DrRacket plugin has been moved from the
Racket distribution to the Racket package repository.
It might be good to include some very quick instructions on how to
install it.
* The Optimization Coach DrRacket
I have found what I think may be a bug in Racket's constant propagation:
(unsafe-fx* 0 (error 'foo))
does not throw and error and evaluates to 0. If 0 is replaced with
another value, or if it's `read' in, the error is thrown.
`unsafe-fxquotient' has the same issue.
On the one hand, this is
At Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:59:01 -0500,
mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
899a327 Matthew Flatt mfl...@racket-lang.org 2013-02-26 14:14
:
| add experimental support for phaseless modules
|
After reading the docs, I find the name phaseless confusing. IIUC,
these modules are not special because they
At Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:46:37 -0500,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
- Match Tests
- Typed Racket Tests
Both done.
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
Pushed. Commit e763d1e1ae7cfe04d0fff173292340b6fd6c4ae6
At Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:57:51 -0500,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
- define-inline (b715a6fe)
* Added `define-inline' which defines functions that are guaranteed to
be inlined.
Vincent
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
At Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:57:39 -0700,
Neil Toronto wrote:
On 01/02/2013 02:51 PM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
In your experience, have these types caused you trouble other than when
you went looking for them specifically?
Not that I recall. If I stick to union types like Integer,
Exact
At Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:39:21 -0700,
Neil Toronto wrote:
Interesting. My extremely limited experience -- and Shriram's --
suggests an eternal struggle with the numerical tower for 'beginners'
like myself.
This is my experience as well.
One place this bit me pretty early was getting TR
At Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:27:50 -0700,
Neil Toronto wrote:
1. Allow submodules to extend the reader.
Would using `#lang typed/racket/no-check' instead of `#lang racket' for
the top-level module work? It extends the reader and provides TR's
annotated forms, but otherwise counts as an untyped
At Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:21:53 -0600,
Robby Findler wrote:
OC could suggest moving heavily called functions across boundaries, that'd
be cool.
That sounds interesting, and would be a good use of profiling
information. Added to my to-do list.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Vincent
At Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:04 -0500,
stamo...@racket-lang.org wrote:
b715a6f Vincent St-Amour stamo...@racket-lang.org 2012-12-14 11:39
:
| Add define-inline.
|
| Drop-in replacement for define that guarantees inlining.
:
M collects/meta/props | 2 ++
A collects
I just got tripped up, again, trying to traverse a list with `first' and
`rest' in a `racket/base' file. `first' and `rest' are only available in
`racket' and `racket/list', but not in `racket/base'.
If we want to encourage use of `first' and `rest' over `car' and `cdr'
and of `racket/base' when
At Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:51:42 -0500,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
A few minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
I agree with Eli. first is not car and shouldn't be treated as it.
car : (Cons a b) - a
first : (List a) - a
Right -- it's a different type, and the `list?' check adds a cost.
I don't
At Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:27:20 -0700,
Neil Toronto wrote:
On 12/06/2012 04:12 PM, stamo...@racket-lang.org wrote:
cc8bd4f Vincent St-Amour stamo...@racket-lang.org 2012-12-06 11:59
:
| Make srclocs serializable.
:
M collects/racket/private/serialize.rkt | 10
Providing `zip' is still useful IMO, both for people who don't know /
remember that trick and as a shorthand.
Vincent
At Fri, 9 Nov 2012 07:34:35 -0500 (EST),
J. Ian Johnson wrote:
[forgot reply all]
zip is unnecessary because of n-ary map.
(zip l0 l1) = (map list l0 l1)
-Ian
-
At Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:29:43 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
stamourv:
- scheme language deprecation notice (68260a6c86)
- compat: packages, mutable lists (800a328fe6)
- NaN included in all float types (a6d5a98b61)
* The `#lang scheme' language is deprecated. `#lang racket' should be
, I'm not sure that any of
these should be in the release announcement, unless maybe there's something
I'm missing about the changes?
Robby
On Sunday, October 28, 2012, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:29:43 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
stamourv:
- scheme language
At Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:11:22 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
- Match Tests
- Typed Racket Tests
All passed.
Insert large letters is currently broken, though. Sam's on it.
- Typed Racket Updates: update
At Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:52:49 -0400,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
A few minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
I consider this problem distinct from Vincent's.
Yes, the problem is separate (hence moving the discussion) -- it's the
feature that he mentioned (being able to hide types) that I was
At Sun, 16 Sep 2012 17:10:01 -0500,
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Suppose we had started Racket long ago and maintained it until
now. Then we'd be looking at 8bit, 16, 32, and 64 precision. In some N
years from now, we may need 128. (Actually there were machines in the
past that did, but never
At Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:45:43 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
The original message in this thread suggests that there is a type
Single-Flonum and that it is making Neil wrangle his code to be
careful about it.
Right, TR supports `Single-Flonum's, but not `f32vector's.
Part of the complexity in
Single-precision float support used to be enabled via a configure
option, which meant that some Racket installations would support them,
and some would not.
Since zo files are meant to be portable, they could not contain
single-precision floats. So, compilation would promote single literals
to
a and is not a substruct? predicate to make such things work?
Robby
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
TR's complex number optimizations eliminate repeated boxing and unboxing
in chains of operations that each consume and produce complex
At Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:28:56 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On 08/02/2012 11:16 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
[...]
* There is now a very complete completion code for zsh. It is not
included in the distribution though, get it at: http://goo.gl/DU8JK
(This script and the bash
At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:26:56 -0700,
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
To start afresh, here are two suggestions, which are mutually
exclusive. The first is my preference:
1. Revert the addition of
At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:36:06 -0400,
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
On Jul 31, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
To reiterate after my absence: I won't write a typed math/vector
until using its exports in Typed Racket wouldn't be a huge friggin'
PITA.
Let me rephrase this ever so
At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:04:40 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:08:16 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Mutable pair functions are in `racket/base', I didn't touch these and am
not planning to. Mutable list functions, though, I moved. The name is
misleading.
Should
At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:10:28 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:33:54 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
How about having a `compatibility' collect, which would include this and
things like `racket/package' (compatibility with Chez) and `racket/mpair'
(compatibility
At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:00:12 -0400,
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Having said that, I would like to propose that we COPY
files/subcollections from racket/ to compatibility/ (and keep them in
sync) if we wish to indicate that they are not really rackety.
Assuming you mean keeping the same interface
At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:52:06 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:00:12 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
I fully and enthusiastically agree with this perspective but I don't think
this
is high on our list of things to do.
When we consider such moves, we should always
At Sun, 29 Jul 2012 10:15:17 -0400,
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
With all due respect. Was there a reason why parametric imports don't
work? They do change behavior in a way that doesn't jive with the TR
port-to-typed-without-change-in-semantics philosophy.
Parametric imports were already in
At Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:26:53 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
stamourv:
- enable performance report for typed/racket/base (b73421f8)
- Optimization Coach (formerly Performance Report) now reports
information about Racket's inlining optimizations. Optimization Coach
can be launched in any
At Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:17:22 -0400,
as...@racket-lang.org wrote:
3582b57 Asumu Takikawa as...@racket-lang.org 2012-07-20 15:10
:
| Move mzlib/defmacro = racket/defmacro
I'm not sure this belongs in `racket'. This is not a Racket feature.
It's closer to a CL compatibility library.
How about
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:33:02 -0400,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
Or maybe add a new tools collection for other similar things?
I'm about to push the new version of Optimization Coach (formerly
Performance Report). Since it now works with any language (not just TR),
it would make sense to move it outside
(Performance) tuning?
Vincent
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
tools seems like too generic of a word. Is there something like
performance-debugging that isn't so long?
Robby
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote
At Sun, 8 Jul 2012 08:40:41 -0400,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
Quick summary: I'll remove the #:before-first and #:after-last
feature. If anyone wants them, please tell me -- maybe it can be left
for the spliced case, or maybe they could always be spliced.
+2 to always splicing.
This gives us the
:
Better than tools, IMO. How about perf? Ie, perf/future-visualizer
and perf/optimization-coach/ ?
Robby
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
(Performance) tuning?
Vincent
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
tools
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:37:19 -0700,
Neil Toronto wrote:
On 07/11/2012 09:25 AM, stamo...@racket-lang.org wrote:
84feb38 Vincent St-Amour stamo...@racket-lang.org 2011-10-11 14:26
:
| Enable performance report no matter the language.
:
M collects/typed-racket/optimizer/tool/tool.rkt
+1
Vincent
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:04:11 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
What about naming the collection tuning?
Robby
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
I would prefer the full word, performance.
But with a name like that, I would expect
Some tools have components that are required programmatically. E.g., the
macro-debugger's useless requires detector or the graphical debugger
API (which doesn't seem to be documented). Moving them may break code.
But I do agree that a top-level `tool' collect would make sense.
Vincent
At Wed,
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:00:26 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
How about a tools drop-down?
Or Online Optimization Coach (You can do
it, Vincent!)
I had that same thought, actually: online check syntax is
At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:13:24 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
Version 1.2 of cdrswift.plt seems to use the slideshow-insert-pict-box
string constant, but it is up to version 1.5 now.
http://planet.racket-lang.org/display.ss?package=cdrswift.pltowner=dignatof
Probably best to just leave them
At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:23:04 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
I was thinking along similar lines.
But maybe it would be helpful to do this for all of the unused
string-constants in the tree?
Good idea.
Vincent
_
Racket Developers list:
At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:44:28 -0400,
Neil Van Dyke wrote:
I'm still using some mzlib in *new* code. Specifically, getpid,
this-expression-source-directory, gethostname, and perhaps one or
two other things. I could find other ways to do those things if I had
to, but those definitions pop up
I really like this.
Vincent
At Sun, 1 Jul 2012 09:27:00 -0400,
Eli Barzilay wrote:
There rare cases where it is useful to have a value that means that no
argument was passed to a function. In many of these cases there is a
plain value that is used as that mark, with the most idiomatic
At Sun, 1 Jul 2012 20:10:30 -0400,
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
I had misunderstood. I thought you had suggested 'reduction of
strength' (say going from square to * or double to +), which is a
generally useful compiler optimization. What you suggest is some form of
conditional version of this.
At Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:12:05 -0400,
Asumu Takikawa wrote:
* for consistency with the rest of the language, `stx-car` and
friends would be renamed to use the `syntax-` prefix instead of
`stx-`.
+1
I always get these names wrong.
* the name of the library is also consistent with
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
